No related posts.

Comments 472

  1. Michael wrote:

    Absolutely. In my mind you can have no info lit program without a tech component. It’s becoming one in the same, and changing so rapidly!

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 6:10 am
  2. Jason Griffey wrote:

    Thanks for the great comment! I appreciate the answers very much…it’s a topic I’ve struggled with recently.

    For me, it really seems to boil down to critical thinking skills, which is something that SHOULD be taught throughout the college curricula. More of my thoughts on Pattern Recognition early next week!

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 2:04 pm
  3. lauren wrote:

    Exactly! Any information literacy program should address not only paper and electronic library resources, but the general world of information, which is increasingly electronic. Thanks for the comment!

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 8:57 pm
  4. lauren wrote:

    There is also a strong argument for information literacy throughout the college curricula as well. I’m looking forward to your post next week!

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 9:00 pm
  5. Travis Ennis wrote:

    Thanks, Lauren. I hope it does prove helpful. As I said in my first post, if you have ideas, feedback, etc. just send them my way.

    Posted 07 Jan 2006 at 6:30 pm
  6. lauren wrote:

    Will do! Thanks, again, for the service!

    Posted 07 Jan 2006 at 9:23 pm
  7. Travis Ennis wrote:

    Identity 2.0 is potentially more interesting than Web 2.0 ever will be. That, along with the concepts of Attention and Gestures, will, in my opinion, revolutionize the web if they take hold. I’ve been mentioning these ideas some in my blog, but only superficially. I haven’t yet gotten to the point where I understand how or if they will affect libraries. Dick Hardt, who gave the awesome presentation you point to, was interviewed in the Talking with Talis podcast series. It’s well worth listening to; later in the series, they also talk with Ed Batista, who is involved with Attention Trust.

    Posted 14 Jan 2006 at 4:41 am
  8. Michael wrote:

    Hey! The class I teach at Dominican has many of thses elements. My dream class for SLIS students has all of them. Good work!

    Posted 14 Jan 2006 at 4:55 am
  9. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for the comment, Travis! I’m going to look into the Hardt/Talking with Talis podcast (as well as all things Identity 2.0). I look forward to checking out your blog for thoughts on Identity 2.0, too.

    Posted 16 Jan 2006 at 11:31 pm
  10. lauren wrote:

    Your class sounds great! I agree, it’d be extremely useful for all SLIS students to have a background in these elements. Not only do they have an impact on our users’ information context, but they’re excellent ways for us to learn more about our own profession!

    Posted 16 Jan 2006 at 11:34 pm
  11. Joshua Porter wrote:

    Thanks, Lauren! Let me know how I can do better…

    Posted 18 Jan 2006 at 1:33 pm
  12. Craig wrote:

    Lauren-

    I also heard and enjoyed the Basbanes talk. I remember when his earlier book- A Gentle Madness-was published, my supervisor at the time felt the book was dangerous!

    Imagine that! Gentle Madness mentioned several norious library thieves-and that nfo out there might be bad for library security or something..not sure.

    anyway- great site!

    Posted 02 Feb 2006 at 1:14 pm
  13. lauren wrote:

    Thanks Craig! I don’t know much about Gentle Madness, but I need to check it out!

    Posted 04 Feb 2006 at 11:05 pm
  14. brian wrote:

    Thanks for doing this. We were told it was going to be a txt chat and sort of were not ready to blab on about this topic. Looks like you captured it all very well– and fast!

    Posted 21 Apr 2006 at 10:46 am
  15. lauren wrote:

    Thanks, Brian! It was a really interesting session!!

    Posted 21 Apr 2006 at 12:01 pm
  16. Dorai Thodla wrote:

    Thank you for mentioning InfoMinder. There is a version (25 pages) available for $9/year. There is a free trial for users to evaluate the product against the free version. Then they can decide whether the small price is worth it.

    Posted 27 Apr 2006 at 10:34 am
  17. Chris Brogan... wrote:

    Hi Lauren– I’m glad the Lifehack post worked for you. I’m a big fan of libraries and librarians (I think I just gave a hack about using library books to help time people’s consumption of books), so I’m glad this had some mindshare with you. I love your Flickr as a training tool. It really helps add to the conversation. Further, I love the concept of library 2.0, and look forward to reading more of your posts in this regard. You rock!

    –Chris…
    ===============
    [chrisbrogan.com]
    and Lifehack.org
    ===============

    Posted 17 May 2006 at 3:58 pm
  18. lauren wrote:

    Thanks, Chris! I’ll look into finding your Lifehack post about library books. It sounds interesting!!

    Posted 17 May 2006 at 9:26 pm
  19. John wrote:

    Thanks Lauren.

    I think I like that Chico State librarian’s blog even more, at http://meriam-library-gov-doc-news-blog.blogspot.com/. Here are her recent entries:

    Previous Posts

    * Wadeable Streams Assessment
    * Printable Maps from NationalAtlas.gov
    * National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza
    * Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006 (FRPAA)
    * EPA’s Green Vehicle Guide
    * 50th Anniversary of the Interstate Highway System
    * READ Government Documents
    * Country Reports on Terrorism
    * Beyond the Box Score : Baseball Records in the National Archives
    * Visible Earth

    Posted 18 May 2006 at 10:41 am
  20. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for the link, John! I’ve added it to my Bloglines account. I hope summer is treating you well… any interesting classes?

    Posted 18 May 2006 at 10:57 am
  21. John Wiswell wrote:

    Interesting. I read the 2 posts about the Librarian’s Dilemma. Is this where we’re headed? Ethnographers and autonomous, disruptive units.

    First at
    http://ericschnell.blogspot.com/2006/04/libqual-and-librarians-dilemma.html
    about getting beyond just listening to users and their stated needs. See the reference to the U of Rochester library hiring an anthropologist/ ethnographer to study users.

    Also the need to “set up autonomous organizations charged with building a new and independent businesses around the disruptive technologies” (at http://ericschnell.blogspot.com/2006/04/librarians-dilemma_11.html ) instead of just relying on more continuous responses to user needs.

    Thanks Lauren.

    Posted 30 May 2006 at 11:55 am
  22. Eric Schnell wrote:

    I fear that libraries are at risk of and on the way to becoming archives and gathering places. Perhaps this is fine with many in the profession. I feel that as a community we have much to offer in an effort to influence and guide technological advances. These ideas are simply possible way for libraries to deal with the current envionment which is changing the ground beneath us. We either need to move now or take the chance of falling into a sinkhole.

    Posted 31 May 2006 at 12:58 pm
  23. lauren pressley wrote:

    John,
    Thanks for the links… interesting reading!
    Eric,
    I’m just getting started reading your blog, but I think I agree with a lot of what you say.

    It seems to me that libraries can and should be each: archives, gathering places, and technological innovators. There is merit in each of these and I think that libraries have something unique to offer in each role. I worry that it’s easy for people (particularly the general public) to assume the library is only an archive or a gathering space, though. That’s one of the many reasons I’m interested in how libraries and librarians can learn about, educate people about, innovate on, influence, and guide technology. There’s certainly something to including ethnographers, anthropologists, and disruptive units in the process. This is why I think it’s such an exciting time to be in the middle of it all.

    (So, John, I guess you could say I’m interested in the “change agent” role we discussed in management class. :) )

    Posted 01 Jun 2006 at 11:43 pm
  24. Paula wrote:

    I am so glad you posted this, as I was late, lost in the other end of 3rd floor, and literally couldn’t get in the room.

    Posted 30 Jun 2006 at 12:38 pm
  25. lauren pressley wrote:

    No problem! Thanks for commenting. Several times I was a little late to where I was going due to the tricky room numbering on the 3rd floor!

    Posted 05 Jul 2006 at 9:39 pm
  26. Helene wrote:

    I hope you’re among them :)

    Posted 16 Jul 2006 at 1:26 am
  27. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Helene! I am, and we’re all really, really looking forward to it! I, too, am particularly interested in seeing your Learning 2.0 plan. Looks like a lot of exciting things are happening in Charlotte!

    Posted 16 Jul 2006 at 12:12 pm
  28. Amanda wrote:

    Did you find anyone that blogged “Leadership for Learning”?

    Posted 19 Jul 2006 at 1:07 pm
  29. lauren pressley wrote:

    I haven’t run across anything yet. If I do, I’ll post a link!

    Posted 20 Jul 2006 at 12:02 am
  30. Derek Woodgate wrote:

    Thank you so much for covering the panel. From my perspective it was interesting delivery a speech on our process, fused with the way we think about our approach, whilst using “the future of the book” as a thread. It seems that you made sense of it. Pleased you are enjoying the scout role. If you are seriously interested in pursuing the possibilities in future studies, please e-mail me. I can both give you some points of reference (most of the members of my team graduiated in futures studies) and put you in touch with Peter Bishop at UHCL. You can take the course on line as well.
    What is your opinion on the future of the book?
    Best
    Derek

    Posted 22 Jul 2006 at 8:08 am
  31. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Derek,

    Thank you so much for your comments. I will be sure to get in touch with you. I am very interested in at least reading more about future studies. Once I graduate from my MLIS program I might very well be interetested in taking the online course you mention. The coming three months are very busy for me, so it will probably be after that.

    My opinion on the future of the book is that we will see less and less reference resources in paper format. I really think that a lot of the standard reference books will become digital. They’re so costly and slow to produce in paper that it just makes economic sense to put out electronic versions instead. My library tries to buy electronic whenever possible and people also seem to prefer that. I suspect that there may continue to be a *few* reference sources that are real classics that will hang around for a while, though.

    Fiction, though, I think will stay in paper for a while. You can read a paper book on a plane when you aren’t allowed to use electronics. You can read a paper book in the pool. You can throw it in a bag and not worry about if it’ll get damaged. I think that paper fiction will stick around as a luxury item for some time.

    Non-fiction is a bit muddier for me. I’ve yet to find a really useful electronic version of a non-fiction book. However, a majority of non-fiction isn’t meant to be read cover-to-cover the way fiction is. It might just be that the electronic non-fiction books I’ve seen aren’t as useable as they will be in the future.

    Of course, if you talk with the student, they want anything they need for their paper to be in elecronic format and searchable. So if we’re looking at that attitude, it may be that we’re closer to electronic formats that I realize.

    I’ll be in touch in November.
    Thanks,
    Lauren

    Posted 03 Aug 2006 at 9:40 pm
  32. Eric Schnell wrote:

    Thanks for the mention, Lauren.

    Posted 14 Nov 2006 at 9:49 pm
  33. evonne wrote:

    I’ve collected more Camp Darfur photos from our real world camps and the Second Life camp here; we also published 3000 of the real Camp Darfur Comix as a way to educate kids on what’s happening in Darfur today. Thanks for blogging and sharing this project with others.

    Posted 29 Nov 2006 at 1:52 am
  34. Dr. Mohamed Taher wrote:

    Happy holidays.
    Will be happy to add you in linkedin, send me email at mt2222 yahoo . com
    As a librarian who believes in knowledge sharing, I wish to share something with you.
    My 2007 resolution is a friendly deal to get more comments at my blog and promptly reciprocate.
    Best wishes for 2007.

    Posted 26 Dec 2006 at 10:28 pm
  35. Pilar M. Moreno wrote:

    Hello Lauren!

    If you are interested in “the social nature of knowledge on the web” I would recommend the articles of Nancy Van House about the sharing of knowledge in network communities and the implications for the design of digital libraries.

    I am very interested also in the area of IL, I think that there is no so much literature about the relation between SE and IL. If you know some sources on the subject I will be very grateful to know.

    Regards, PM

    Posted 09 Jan 2007 at 9:16 pm
  36. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for sharing! I’ll be sure to look up Nancy Van House’s work! It sounds excellent.

    I haven’t found a lot on SE and IL, but I’ve found some. I have a list of articles I’d like to find on another computer. I’ll see if I can get it tomorrow to share with you.

    Posted 10 Jan 2007 at 12:17 am
  37. lauren pressley wrote:

    My list had less information than I remembered, but it looks like it would be worth looking into E. Whitmire.

    Epistemological beliefs & the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates in
    Library and Information Science Research 25(2003)

    The Relationship between Undergraduates’ epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and other information-seeking behavior
    Information Processing and Management 40(2004)

    Posted 11 Jan 2007 at 6:53 pm
  38. Pilar M. Moreno wrote:

    Thank you very much Lauren! I will read the articles you recommended.

    About your questions:
    “For those who are interested in the theoretical underpinnings, what shortcomings do you see? What areas need to be developed?”
    I find that they are difficult to answer, but very interesting. I think the area of feminist epistemology in social epistemology related to LIS has been not explored until now.
    I will think more on your questions and write some responses in other messages.

    Regards, PM

    Posted 13 Jan 2007 at 3:13 pm
  39. Bryan Loar wrote:

    Thanks for your interest in Art Librarians & New ARLIS* Professionals (ArLiSNAP)!

    Cheers,
    Bryan Loar

    Posted 14 Jan 2007 at 5:31 am
  40. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks! I’ll try to think and post more on this topic, too!

    Posted 16 Jan 2007 at 11:40 pm
  41. Pilar M. Moreno wrote:

    I have read the two articles of Ethelene Whitmire. I think it would be interesting to add the social aspect to her analysis. She is centered on individual performance but she doesn’t mention the possible influences of social aspects in these mental processes or information-seeking actions.
    What do you think?

    Posted 18 Jan 2007 at 10:31 am
  42. Renee Racine wrote:

    Hi, you and I never really spoke, but John and I were good friends in college. I was digging through old paperwork after a recent move and having gotten nostalgic, decided to peer around the web and see if I could find out what was new with old John Borwick. Lo and behold, you two are married! Good lord you looked gorgeous! Just wanted to pass on my belated congratulations and wish you both the best. (Your blog is pretty interesting too, got caught up reading it for quite a while).

    Well, back to organizing junk.

    Cheers again,
    Renee Joy Racine

    Posted 07 Feb 2007 at 9:38 pm
  43. Russell wrote:

    It’s gotta be a shared responsibility. I teach a professional development class on IL and librarians really resist giving up the complete and total ownership of IL, which is a huge mistake, in my opinion. Faculty are in a better position to hit at certain standards than we are–they know the literature of their field, etc., in most cases, better than we do. I also believe that this is something that must happen everywhere on our campuses… NOT just “in the library.” Do we, will we still have the biggest role in this? Yes. We create awareness, identify and assess, and ultimately, we know our stuff!

    Posted 13 Feb 2007 at 10:05 am
  44. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments! I’m not arguing against shared responsibility. I think that can be where the strongest programs are formed. I think that in having the biggest role (through creating awareness, identifying and assessing, and through our knowledge) we sometimes are in a position to have the larger impact. Like many trends and interests, I think that it’s most useful to look at the community and see what approach works best there. If the community is looking for IL leadership from the library, then, to me at least, it makes sense for the program to primarily reside there. If a faculty is in a position (and interested) in taking a lead on IL, then a collaboration is the way to go. Great comments, and worth further exploration. Thank you!

    Posted 14 Feb 2007 at 11:48 pm
  45. lauren pressley wrote:

    I certainly am interested in seeing what social aspects could be included. Is there any research you’re aware of in this sphere?

    Posted 14 Feb 2007 at 11:49 pm
  46. Privacywonk wrote:

    My take is this: essentially we’re going to need new tools to help us deal with the proliferation of information on any given person. My current belief is that pseudonymity is the way to go. Check out http://www.globalpov.com. The guy who writes the daily blog, David H. Holtzman, also wrote a book on this topic called Privacy Lost, and it’s his take on this issue of Pseudonymity that really interests me. The phrase I keep hearing “Attribution without retribution” the creation of pseudononymous identities which allow people to try on different viewpoints as they are learning and building their perspective seems almost obvious when you think about it, yet nothing provides a solution to this large and looming problem today.

    Posted 15 Feb 2007 at 2:20 pm
  47. lauren pressley wrote:

    Interesting point! I can see how this makes a lot of sense. Teenagers, it seems, often do try on several different personalities/hobbies/etc while figuring themselves out. Using pseudonyms would allow for this experimentation in a truly anonymous way on the web.

    It’s tricky, though, since social networking sites require you to make contacts with friends. I wonder if there would be a way to retain some level of anonymity while still allowing online connections with friends.

    Posted 17 Feb 2007 at 7:15 pm
  48. Robert wrote:

    I agree that librarians should be concerned with the preservation of information, however, given the ephemeral nature of information, especially information that exists only in digital form, I don’t believe the emphasis on collecting and preserving in libraries is something that is sustainable. Today, libraries are the conduit or signpost to information. We aren’t pack rats just collecting stuff that nobody will ever look at. Not every scrap of information needs to be saved. Culture is embedded within all information resources such that we shouldn’t be overly concerned with the transience of any particular piece of information. I like what the internet archive is doing and if libraries want to invest the time, effort, and money into preserving blogs, that is well and good. But I don’t see it as a pressing social need.

    Posted 08 Mar 2007 at 4:28 pm
  49. Peter Godwin wrote:

    I came across this last week too! Having seen it twice I agree with you that the point which comes across strongly is that students of the future will need to be able to make sense of their world and the evaluation and critical information literacy angle is the key! Therefore I think that we IL champions have hit the nail on the head (as we British say). The stats in the little film are straggering and would be good to provoke lively debate : I’m sure that some of the predictions could be questioned. I loved the bit about England being top nation in 1900 (to be picky it ought to have been Great Britain or the British Empire) but it caught me out cos I thought they were talking about the present!

    Posted 13 Mar 2007 at 5:22 am
  50. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for commenting, Peter! I’m with you, some of the video is probably quite questionable, but the boldness and extreme qualities of the video is part of what makes it so thought-provoking, too. I checked out your blog and added it to my reader. I’m looking forward to following your blog… your interests are similar to mine!

    Posted 15 Mar 2007 at 7:51 pm
  51. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for commenting, Robert.

    I agree, focusing on saving every scrap of digital information isn’t sustainable. I, too, like what the internet archive is doing. We differ, though, in that I do see a need to preserve this digital information. Digital information, as we’ve all experienced, can be here one day and gone the next. For this reason, I’m really happy that my home state is archiving North Carolina government websites. Not all blogs and social media will be worth the effort to archive, but some will be. I think of all the political campaign blogs that will be useful to political science scholars. I also think of local blogs that are another type of media that makes sense to keep in local special collections. But, it’s just my opinion.

    Thanks for the conversation and the opportunity to further the discussion!

    Posted 15 Mar 2007 at 8:00 pm
  52. Pilar M. Moreno wrote:

    You can read first Patrick Wilson’s “Bibliographic Instruction and cognitive authority” in Library Trends, v.39, no.3, 1991, 259-270. And then, the more recent work of Soo Young Rieh. Check her homepage at: http://www.si.umich.edu/rieh/

    Posted 25 Mar 2007 at 11:22 am
  53. lauren wrote:

    Thanks! I’ll check that out!!

    Posted 31 Mar 2007 at 9:57 pm
  54. Pilar M. Moreno wrote:

    Lauren,

    I have just read your paper about “Social Epistemology in Library and Information Science”.
    Of course, I have comments on it.
    I find it very interesting mostly from the point of view of the context and actual applications of social epistemology in library practice.
    I don`t agree, however, on the relationships you established between sociology and social epistemology. Shera explained the difference between those fields of inquiry in “Sociological Foundations of Librarianship” (1970, New York: Asia Publishing House).
    Usually, philosophy is considered -methodologically speaking- conceptual and normative; and sociology, empirical and descriptive (I think the best explanation of that idea is in: Resnik, D. 1996. Social epistemology and the ethics of research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27(4), 565-586). Fuller is a sociologist of science who claims that social epistemology must be normative. So, I think the most sociological approach to social epistemology is that of the construtivist views. Normative research seek to evaluate practices (Goldman) or organizations (Fuller) for recommending the best ways to acquire knowledge. Descriptive ones, in turn, analize and explain the ways knowledge is socially constructed (see for example Tuominen & Savolainen).
    I think we as librarians could follow any of these three options, as Fallis (following mostly Goldman), Zandonade (in agreement with Fuller) and Van House (agreeing mostly with constructivist theories) have done.

    I hope it can be useful to you. Sorry if it is a too long comment.

    Posted 04 Apr 2007 at 2:21 pm
  55. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thank you for your comment, of course it is not too long. I really appreciate your input! This paper was done as an independent study, with minimal guidance, and I was doing it mostly as an exploration so that I could have a basic understanding of these ideas. Your points are well taken, and I appreciate the insights you suggest.

    Posted 15 Apr 2007 at 2:34 pm
  56. Sarah Houghton-Jan (Librarian in Black) wrote:

    Thanks for sharing your presentation. I think many others will find your work useful!

    Posted 23 Apr 2007 at 12:55 pm
  57. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks so much, Sarah!

    Posted 23 Apr 2007 at 9:14 pm
  58. Megan wrote:

    Congratulations! I was IMing with a mutual acquaintance the other day and we both said, “Whoever gets Lauren when she’s done with her degree is going to be so lucky!” So nice that your current employer thinks the same thing. :)

    Posted 23 Apr 2007 at 10:31 pm
  59. lauren pressley wrote:

    Aw, shucks, Megan! Thanks for your kind words! It is really exciting to be at a place where I’m able to do interesting things and where they like me enough to keep me around. :) Having a job lined up makes the whole graduation thing a lot more fun, too. :)

    Posted 23 Apr 2007 at 11:22 pm
  60. Dallas Freeman wrote:

    I’m interested into what courses you teach? Drop me an email as I’m keen to share resources and knowledge.

    Posted 24 Apr 2007 at 5:27 am
  61. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Dallas, I teach a one credit hour information literacy class. It’s a introduction to research class that focuses on print, database, and web resources. I tend to focus on the total information environment, which is why I talk about Web 2.0 as part of the research process.

    I do workshops on emerging technology and web 2.0, too.

    Lauren

    Posted 24 Apr 2007 at 10:24 pm
  62. Mary Ghikas wrote:

    What you are linking to is a paper done by R. David Lankes and colleagues at Syracuse University for the American Library Association’s Office for Information Technology Policy on impact of participatory technologies on libraries — “the library as conversation.” I’d be interested in your feedback on the concepts discussed. mg

    Posted 25 Apr 2007 at 1:43 pm
  63. Frank Baker wrote:

    Media Literacy Clearinghouse #1 US based website for teaching resources and information

    Posted 01 May 2007 at 9:06 am
  64. smita wrote:

    thanks for your presentation

    Posted 09 May 2007 at 1:49 am
  65. Molly Keener wrote:

    Too bad David Sedaris likely won’t see this…

    Posted 06 Jun 2007 at 5:33 pm
  66. lauren pressley wrote:

    I thought the same thing! :)

    Posted 07 Jun 2007 at 8:57 am
  67. Alice Yucht wrote:

    Also look at the Four Resources Model @ http://www.readingonline.org/research/lukefreebody.html, found by following the link from ‘Asking Questions…’

    Posted 08 Jun 2007 at 4:52 pm
  68. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thank you! I’ve posted again on the topic here. and will send you an email, too!

    Posted 08 Jun 2007 at 5:09 pm
  69. Mark wrote:

    Hi Lauren,

    I just read the report as it was cited by David Pimentel in his paper for NASKO 2007. I’ll be commenting on it my “Some Things Read This Week…” post for this week.

    I, too, am new to Conversation Theory. While it seems quite useful, I also worry that it has makes practically everything into conversation. And while metaphors are good they always break down at some point. Perhaps I’ll just have to read the Pask book.

    Posted 09 Jun 2007 at 1:18 pm
  70. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comment, Mark. I’ll look forward to reading your “Some Things Read This Week” post.

    I can see your hesitation with Conversation Theory. I have to admit that my tendency is to rather enthusiastically embrace ideas that appear promising, then to read up on them, then to draw my “real” conclusions. I’m in the enthusiastically embracing phase for CT, and need to read some Pask. I’d most like to read his Conversation Theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology, which my library doesn’t carry. It looks like I’ll need to look into ILLing it. When I do, I’m sure I’ll have more to say here!

    Posted 10 Jun 2007 at 10:22 pm
  71. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Alice! Interesting site and concepts! Is this something you have presented/consulted on? Thanks for pointing it out!

    Posted 10 Jun 2007 at 11:12 pm
  72. Steve Casburn wrote:

    I do think it would be wise to teach children how to exercise traits, but if we do not at the same time give them a skill set — however transient — with which to practice and hone those traits, then would any of what they were taught about exercising traits stick?

    Posted 18 Jun 2007 at 2:42 am
  73. Simin wrote:

    “Recently, American social scientists of a neo-Tocquevillean bent have unearthed a wide range of empirical evidence that the quality of public life and the performance of social institutions (and not only in America) are indeed powerfully influenced by norms and networks of civic engagement.” By Robert Putnam.
    Is there a relationship between the rise in the number of women in the work force and the changes in the civic engagement?

    Posted 28 Jun 2007 at 8:56 am
  74. Jason Setzer wrote:

    First off, you get to teach a credit course on information literacy? I’m so jealous. I agree with you about the need to address Web 2.0 sources in information literacy classes. It’s my gut feeling that students and most faculty don’t really grasp that these technologies can be sources of scholarship or that they can be used as avenues for scholarly communication. One thing I try to stress to my students about research is that there is some information that is only available in electronic form. Likewise, there is some information that is only available in print. A comprehensive understanding of their subject will likely lead them to information in multiple formats.

    I’m getting ready to read Weinberger’s book and am looking forward to see how he addresses the issue of order. As for extinction, don’t fret. AI has some significant leaps to make before being able to replace librarians.

    Posted 30 Jul 2007 at 7:56 pm
  75. Peter Godwin wrote:

    This is very interesting. I have given a number of presentations around this topic recently in the UK : Information Literacy and Web 2.0. I have taken the line that Web 2.0 affects us first of all as information professionals and that we have to investigate these new tools, acquire them as we can, and that Web 2.0 ( as you say) affects the content of our teaching (eg Wikipedia as a valid startup source, blogs for up to date infgormation) and the means that we can teach eg using blogs, YouTube, wikis, podcasts etc.
    I must admit that I get very bored with endless debates about what IL is, and suspect that many of these debates arew sterile! Taking the SCONUL Seven Pillars model as a starting point what I can detect is that the emphasis which we give to each “pillar” is changing. We have to spend more time on what constitutes information, teaching a sense of context, critical thinking about which media to use and its validity and above all the ability to evaluate and choose from the material we find. I guess its less about the vagaries of the databases that we subscribe to, because these are only one plank, albeit an important one, in the information scenario that our users can choose from.
    So thank you for this post : perhaps I am on the right track and the book that I am currently co-editing on IL meets Library 2.0 will be useful…

    Posted 31 Jul 2007 at 4:03 am
  76. lauren pressley wrote:

    Jason–
    Thanks, it is really exciting to teach a credit course. We’re lucky, at MPOW. There is real support for the course among faculty and advisors. I know other schools have tried to start a course but have had an uphill battle. Good point to stress: that just as some information is only online, so is some only in print. I hope you enjoy Weinberger’s book. It really blew me away.

    Peter–
    Thanks, your presentations sound very interesting! I appreciate your take on IL and the “big” questions: “what constitutes information, teaching a sense of context, critical thinking about which media to use and its validity and above all the ability to evaluate and choose from the material we find.” I look forward to your book once it’s out. It sounds like it will make some interesting points!

    Posted 31 Jul 2007 at 9:46 am
  77. Jason Setzer wrote:

    I don’t think the concept of information literacy is as ethereal as many think. To put information literacy in a context that my students can understand, I liken it to investigative journalism. You need to know what you don’t know, uncover what you don’t know, and decide how you’re going to use what you find. Of course, those are loaded statements. Where do discussions of authority fit in? Media literacy? Communication theory?

    Now you see why I’m jealous of Lauren’s credit course. It would take some time to teach a comprehensive course on info lit.

    Posted 31 Jul 2007 at 5:51 pm
  78. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Jason, I agree, info lit really is more like journalism or detective work than some theoretical concept that is hard to pin down. I’ve recently been thinking about the importance of critical thinking and media literacy skills that are cornerstones to what I consider information literacy. Since I’m spending time thinking about this, I include it in my course. However, I wonder if this is an area were we are stepping on the toes of other disciplines. Should it be housed in communication? If so, would as many students take the class since it would appear tied to a major? For now, though, I’m going to continue including anything along these lines that I can. It just seems too important not to.

    Posted 01 Aug 2007 at 11:52 am
  79. Megan wrote:

    I love Google, too!!!!

    Posted 22 Aug 2007 at 9:17 am
  80. megan wrote:

    i’m so jealous you can use google calendar with outlook. i’m stuck using meetingmaker at work, and while i’m very comfortable with it, i’d MUCH prefer to use google calendar. alas, i don’t think mm will ever talk to it. sigh….

    Posted 22 Aug 2007 at 11:26 am
  81. lauren pressley wrote:

    thanks for the comments! i have very little faith in the big vendors making their calendars compatible with google’s, but i wouldn’t be surprised if google tries to do their best to make their products compatible with others…. if ever they make it compatible with meetingmaker, i’m sure they’d announce it here: http://www.google.com/googlecalendar/new.html fwiw!

    Posted 22 Aug 2007 at 11:19 pm
  82. Michelle wrote:

    Lauren, you said the exact same thing I was thinking: If people are playing on their laptops instead of taking notes, you are boring them. Do something different.

    Posted 29 Aug 2007 at 2:43 pm
  83. lauren wrote:

    exactly! thanks for the comment!

    Posted 29 Aug 2007 at 11:54 pm
  84. John Borwick wrote:

    In fact, Twitter just IMed me that you posted a blog entry!

    Posted 17 Sep 2007 at 9:37 pm
  85. lauren pressley wrote:

    :) so useful!

    Posted 17 Sep 2007 at 9:43 pm
  86. Sushil wrote:

    Hi,

    I am using both Slideshare and authorSTREAM.
    But , I find the audio presentations upload using authorSTREAM have an edge …. The audio quality and sync is superb on navigation between in authorSTREAM but in slide share whole presentation goes out of sync….

    I have tried the trial version of authorPOINT 3.8 for capturing my presentations with audio …. and uploaded the audio is great and superb sync is there …. Animations are there … narrations are supported , animated gifs too are supported… I think the slideshare users have to move to authorSTREAM … now

    Posted 19 Sep 2007 at 11:09 pm
  87. Jason Setzer wrote:

    Creative Commons rock’eth! Have you ever done any Creative Commons training with faculty?

    Posted 26 Sep 2007 at 8:22 am
  88. megan wrote:

    we just used this video in lab today with a group of first-years! i love CC.

    Posted 26 Sep 2007 at 7:31 pm
  89. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Jason, Megan! I’ve not done CC training with faculty. Have you had the opportunity, Jason? Did they find it useful? I bet the first years enjoyed it, Megan. It’s certainly more interesting than a dry lecture!

    Posted 26 Sep 2007 at 9:44 pm
  90. Jennifer Macaulay wrote:

    Lauren, I had some similar thoughts while watching The Office last night. I think in some ways we tie technological diversity to age because different generations often come to the table with different comfort levels with different technologies. However, this is dangerous because there are plenty of younger technophobes and older technophiles.

    I thought the funniest part of the episode was Creed’s attempt to be 30. I laughed and laughed and laughed.

    Thanks for the thought-provoking post.

    Posted 05 Oct 2007 at 9:46 am
  91. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for the comment, Jennifer! I loved Creed’s attempt, too…. sooo funny! Sooo Creed!

    Posted 05 Oct 2007 at 11:31 am
  92. Jason Griffey wrote:

    Congrats! I hope that you get a lot out of the program….

    Posted 10 Oct 2007 at 1:52 pm
  93. Patricia Thompson wrote:

    Congratulations!

    Posted 10 Oct 2007 at 4:19 pm
  94. Linda Shippert wrote:

    Congratulations! I look forward to meeting you!

    Posted 10 Oct 2007 at 5:20 pm
  95. Mark wrote:

    Congrats Lauren!

    Posted 10 Oct 2007 at 5:57 pm
  96. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks everyone! I look forward to meeting you, too, Linda!

    Posted 10 Oct 2007 at 7:50 pm
  97. Molly wrote:

    Fantastic!!

    Posted 11 Oct 2007 at 5:29 pm
  98. Jenny Levine wrote:

    Whoo-hoo! Hopefully we’ll get to work together on your project! :)

    Posted 11 Oct 2007 at 7:46 pm
  99. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Molly & Jenny!

    Jenny: Yay! I’m looking forward to finding out more about the projects!

    Posted 11 Oct 2007 at 10:18 pm
  100. K.G. Schneider wrote:

    Just catching up here. BRAVA!!! Have fun with it!

    Posted 14 Oct 2007 at 11:11 pm
  101. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Karen!

    Posted 14 Oct 2007 at 11:46 pm
  102. Michelle L Cz wrote:

    Interesting to here your approach to conferences!
    Sorry I missed meeting you at this one! (I’m already back home in Raleigh now. We have to cover the desk tomorrow for others who are “just” going to the NCLA conference tomorrow!)
    Michelle – (mlcz on Twitter)

    Posted 18 Oct 2007 at 10:15 pm
  103. Michelle L Cz wrote:

    Blah! Sorry for the typo… “here” should have been “hear”… I think I need to go to bed…

    Posted 18 Oct 2007 at 10:16 pm
  104. lauren wrote:

    Hi Michelle, I’m sorry we didn’t cross paths at the conference… hopefully we will sometime soon. I’m back at Wake today, too, for pretty much the same reason… two hours at the reference desk!

    Posted 19 Oct 2007 at 10:05 am
  105. Patricia Thompson wrote:

    I think you’ve identified an important point about the lists being communities.

    One of the key reasons (I think) that lists continue to be so popular is that they deliver the conversation into one’s inbox. You subscribe, and there it is. Many of my colleagues still have no clue about using RSS. I just discovered RSS and the blogosphere early this year, and I’m so hooked that I never have time to read my email lists. I managed to subscribe to a few of them on RSS, but I can’t post from there to join a conversation.

    I really wish all the lists would “convert” to a different format. There are other ways to host a discussion list– it’s just that they haven’t caught on yet by the user base of the lists. I think they will, eventually. It’s just that people are slow. I’ve been reading and participating on email lists since they first came out in the 90s, but many people have only started more recently. Email has been around for a long time, but there are still people who can’t use it correctly, as is evidenced by all the junk that shows up on the lists.

    Posted 20 Oct 2007 at 6:59 pm
  106. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for your comments, Patricia! I agree. The uptake for new technologies can be really slow. I’ve been talking about RSS for at least three years now, and I know just a very small number of the folks I talk to about it have begun using it.

    An interesting thing to me about RSS is that so many people use it (or something a lot like it) without knowing that’s what it is. I’ve talked to a number of students about the feeds in Facebook, and most say something along the lines of “it’s so easy… one stop and you see what all your friends are doing.” I’m like “that’s exactly what rss can do for you!”

    Perhaps when a majority of folks are used to getting centralized updates through Facebook feeds, Google news, or whatever, they’ll start to see that RSS can actually make their lives easier.

    Posted 20 Oct 2007 at 10:03 pm
  107. Abby F. wrote:

    Don’t forget, now people can FOLLOW you in new ways, too! Keep on twittering!

    Posted 26 Oct 2007 at 1:07 pm
  108. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Abby! Good point! The communication goes both ways!

    Posted 29 Oct 2007 at 8:11 pm
  109. tim wrote:

    Hey, that’s my hometown. Where did you wind up eating?

    I only get back a few times a year to visit my folks, but I have to say I really miss it this time of year. The colors in Richmond are nothing compared to that vibrant display you get in the mountains.

    I have to admit that I leave all my computing behind when I go on vacation (no matter how long). I take my cell phone and that’s about it. We always take pictures though and upload them to our flickr account when we get home.

    Honestly, I find that I don’t miss it all that much.

    Posted 02 Nov 2007 at 11:27 am
  110. lauren pressley wrote:

    What a small world! We ate at the Laughing Seed, Early Girl, Jerusalem Garden, and a Noodle place. I love Asheville for a lot of reasons, one of which is the amazing food. :) I can only imagine how much you’d miss it if you came from there. Good to know that I’m not the only one that enjoys leaving the computing behind on vacation. I think I need to get better at clicking the “mark all as read” tab in my rss reader. Thanks for your comment!

    Posted 02 Nov 2007 at 11:44 pm
  111. Techguy wrote:

    Yes I too think so . authorSTREAM is much better approach as compared to SlideShare as authorSTREAM suppport narrations,animations,animated gifs,rehearse timings and also supported by free tool called authorPOINT Lite .

    Posted 03 Nov 2007 at 7:25 am
  112. Arin Crumley wrote:

    Hey there, thanks for linking to the video. It can also be seen on YouTube possibly with a little less load time.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP_3WnJ42kw

    Posted 08 Nov 2007 at 1:31 am
  113. Arin Crumley wrote:

    Hey there, thanks for linking to the video. It can also be seen on YouTube possibly with a little less load time.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP_3WnJ42kw

    Posted 08 Nov 2007 at 1:31 am
  114. Julie, Strange Librarian wrote:

    You’re welcome!

    Posted 08 Nov 2007 at 7:57 am
  115. megan wrote:

    Oooh – great post! I’ve put mine into a blog post: http://www.librarygrrrl.net/2007/11/08/422/.

    Posted 08 Nov 2007 at 9:38 pm
  116. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for the YouTube link Arin…. that’s much faster! I have to say, I found your site because of your Net Neutrality video, but now I’m interested in your film as well. Thanks for all you’re doing!

    Posted 10 Nov 2007 at 12:55 pm
  117. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for sharing Megan! It’s fun to see how we all customize our internet experience… and I really like seeing what others have discovered that I might have missed!

    Posted 10 Nov 2007 at 12:55 pm
  118. Sara wrote:

    Thanks for the tip!

    Posted 12 Nov 2007 at 7:22 pm
  119. lauren pressley wrote:

    No problem! I think it would be awesome if the winning entrant had worked with a librarian… but I think all the entries will be fascinating to watch no matter what!

    Posted 13 Nov 2007 at 12:31 am
  120. Talking Books Librarian wrote:

    He he, have you noticed how many librarian bloggers are posting that they are the Annoyed Librarian? Just to be clear, I have blogged about it as well…

    http://talkingbookslibrarian.blogspot.com/

    Posted 13 Nov 2007 at 1:59 pm
  121. Dave wrote:

    Indeed authorSTREAM is awesome

    Posted 14 Nov 2007 at 2:51 am
  122. Michelle wrote:

    Great response. Banning is no substitute for good teaching.

    Posted 14 Nov 2007 at 11:28 am
  123. Patricia Thompson wrote:

    Congratulations on being named LITA’s Emerging Leader!

    Posted 25 Nov 2007 at 9:25 am
  124. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Patricia!!

    Posted 26 Nov 2007 at 10:41 pm
  125. Karin Dalziel wrote:

    Another great example of this is TechSmith offering a free, older version of Camtasia. Now that I’ve downloaded it and tried it, I’m more likely to shell out for the full version – when I can afford it, that is. And until I can afford it, I’ll be recommending the software to others.

    The problem with the Kindle is that I can’t head down to a store and see it in action. I could do that with the Sony Reader, at least (and I still kinda want one). $400 is a lot to spend on a product sight unseen. Of course, the DRM stuff would keep me from buying anyway, I’m kind of hoping they’ll ease up a but in firmware updates.

    Posted 04 Dec 2007 at 10:27 am
  126. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Karin! Your Camtasia example is exactly what I’m thinking about! I, too, am a much bigger fan of Camtasia now.

    Another good point re: seeing the Kindle. Sadly for Sony, since there was a Reader at the local Borders, I had seen e-ink which actually made me more interested in the Kindle. If I hadn’t been able to see a working example of e-ink in person, I wouldn’t have been interested at all. But I think you’re right; the interface is much different, and it’d certainly be good to see the annotation features and ability to buy over wireless first hand. Let’s hope they get the DRM stuff figured out soon!

    Posted 05 Dec 2007 at 12:53 am
  127. Kieran wrote:

    Hi, this is a free site teachers and their students might enjoy: http://www.interactive-learning.com.au (grades 5-9)

    Posted 12 Dec 2007 at 2:17 am
  128. David Fiander wrote:

    See also Why are there so few female computer scientists.

    Posted 20 Dec 2007 at 11:37 am
  129. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks so much for posting this link, David. The report looks very interesting (and lengthy!) so I’m putting it on my holiday reading list.

    Posted 20 Dec 2007 at 11:57 am
  130. K.G. Schneider wrote:

    Hey, thank you, Lauren… for proving my point! Also, I look forward to seeing you at the LITA Town Hall… my first ever.

    Posted 20 Dec 2007 at 1:59 pm
  131. Julie wrote:

    Most excellent, Lauren!

    Posted 21 Dec 2007 at 2:27 pm
  132. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks! :)

    Posted 21 Dec 2007 at 2:33 pm
  133. WabiSabiMe wrote:

    The “human search engine” aspect of Twitter can’t be overlooked, and it is one of the reasons I follow you and another librarian :-)

    I also use Twitter as my own personal RSS aggregator of sorts. I track keywords and while I often get to busy (or just forget) to check my Google Reader, my iPhone is always with me and makes it easy to quickly scan a lot of relevant info that I otherwise would have missed.

    Posted 21 Dec 2007 at 4:31 pm
  134. Kathryn Greenhill wrote:

    Thanks. Is nice. And true.

    Posted 22 Dec 2007 at 6:14 am
  135. michelle cz. wrote:

    Love it! Great job!!! Nice visual musing…

    Posted 31 Dec 2007 at 5:41 pm
  136. lauren wrote:

    Sure thing, Karen! I think it’s important to raise this point ever so often… David’s recommended reading is really interesting (in case you’re interested).

    Looking forward to seeing you at the Town Hall… hopefully it’ll be a good one! :)

    Posted 02 Jan 2008 at 10:57 pm
  137. Antonio Haynes wrote:

    It sounds to me like you have everything in order. Sometimes you can become so busy and engulfed in life and work that the time will fly past you. If nothing else take time out for yourself and enjoy life a little.

    Posted 02 Jan 2008 at 11:24 pm
  138. Karin Dalziel wrote:

    I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. I even have a half finished blog post to the effect in the works, but have not been able to finish it. We got our first computer much sooner though- my mom was a techno-phile. :) I remember playing Oregon Trail in the library for 25 cents an hour.

    -Karin (b. May, 1979)

    Posted 10 Jan 2008 at 10:20 am
  139. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Karin! I look forward to reading your post! :)

    Posted 10 Jan 2008 at 1:38 pm
  140. Molly wrote:

    I too have been thinking about our generation lately, but more so about the implications our digital/print fence strattling has on our professional expections, and how our outlook may differ from that of the generations on either side of us – even those separated by only a few years.

    Oh how I loved playing Oregon Trail in the school library…

    Molly (b. July 1981)

    Posted 11 Jan 2008 at 6:46 pm
  141. steve foreman wrote:

    I found your website and thought you may be interested in MyiCourse.com, a free, web-based, e-learning platform that is “just right” for those faculty members who want the freedom to create their own on-line educational site, but do not have the budget, servers, IT department support or programming skills to access the typical e-learning solutions. Yes, I did say it was free. No limits. No contracts. No stripped down “free version” with the “real version” requiring money. MyiCourse platform allows a multi-media approach using video, audio, images and PDFs. We emphasize accountability for the students. Students are timed, tested and they can send their transcripts after course completion. MyiCourse.com also allows sharing of academic courses for all to use. In short, a great course on one of our sites can be imported and placed in the course catalog of other MyiCourse sites. MyiCourse also allows you to create a public site for everyone, or a private site that is closed and password protected.

    I would invite you to drop by MyiCourse.com and click on the Learning Center link. Another option would be to Google Myicourse and see what others are saying. I would be most pleased to spend some time with you or others on the telephone and give you an online tour. Let me know what you think. MyiCourse.com, flattening the world one course at a time.

    Thanks for listening.

    Steve Foreman
    steve@myicourse.com

    Posted 13 Jan 2008 at 5:36 pm
  142. Stephanie Willen Brown wrote:

    very handy! I like twitter for troubleshooting-with-other-librarians during the work day, and keeping up with friends / former students as well. Plus finding out what’s going on at Midwinter in a tweet-by-tweet. :-)

    Posted 14 Jan 2008 at 8:25 am
  143. Andrew Pace wrote:

    Nice, write-up, Lauren. This is a very thorough and accurate set of notes on the meeting.

    Posted 14 Jan 2008 at 10:22 pm
  144. Alice Sneary wrote:

    Oh Lauren! I am so sorry to hear that we were a room full of strangers. Shame on us, for not being more welcoming and gracious! And your name is so familiar to me–did we meet at one of the 5 Weeks forums? You were a presenter there, weren’t you?

    I know how hard it is, though, to show up at an event where you don’t know if you are going to know anyone, and don’t know what it’s going to be like. (jeans? suits? in between?)

    We missed you, and yes please Twitter me ahead of time. You’ve got a lot of cool stuff going on–I’d love to hear more about what you’re doing with new tech tools and designing training for students…

    And thanks for the kudos on the blog salon!

    Posted 15 Jan 2008 at 5:43 pm
  145. Peter Bromberg wrote:

    Thanks Lauren. I couldn’t make TTT this year, and your summary gave me a great overview and some good things to think about!

    Posted 16 Jan 2008 at 8:20 am
  146. Ann Tobin wrote:

    I’m at a small library and we’re working on a technology wish list for teens. Getting 2 new teen computers and interested in your ideas for upcoming trends.

    Posted 16 Jan 2008 at 5:40 pm
  147. Anja Smit wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    what a wonderful list of ideas! Great input for discussions in my library on future directions.

    Posted 20 Jan 2008 at 8:57 am
  148. lauren pressley wrote:

    I agree, Stephanie! Twitter makes it easy to follow along at conferences if you aren’t there, and makes them more meaningful if you are!

    Posted 21 Jan 2008 at 7:41 pm
  149. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks!

    Posted 21 Jan 2008 at 7:41 pm
  150. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Alice, thanks for your comment! No problem at all! I really appreciate what you all are doing, and after this blog post a number of folks were interested in meeting up ahead of time for the next one. I imagine you’ll have a number of first timers then! :)

    You’re right, I did participate in 5 weeks! Such a small online library world!

    Posted 21 Jan 2008 at 7:47 pm
  151. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments!

    Ann, I wasn’t actually on the panel… just reporting on it. However, one of my areas of interest is the evaluation and implementation of technology for specific groups, so if you’d like to chat I’d be happy to. My email is lauren@laurenpressley.com.

    Posted 21 Jan 2008 at 7:54 pm
  152. ellie wrote:

    I really like the term “bridge generation.” I’ve definitely felt that way in many of my work interactions. I was born in 79 too and always felt that I was neither a Gen X-er or a Millennial (or Gen Y which is what they were calling the next one along, back when the Gen X-ers were in their 20s). I often find myself struggling trying to explain why when students are searching our various databases some things are going to count as an encyclopedia article and others will be a journal. They never used a print encyclopedia, so that background experience isn’t there when I start talking about the online version. I’m still working on my new approach.

    Your family must have been near bleeding edge. I was one of the first people in my school to have internet access, but I didn’t have it until 11th grade. I pretty much exclusively used it to look up bands and movies. (Although I did play with my Encarta disc too.) :) That year for Christmas I gave everyone all kinds of different printouts – one person got a photo album of pictures of her favorite band along with some interviews, one person got the script for his favorite movie, one person got a 2 binder print out of the entire Heavenly Creatures website. It’s funny how awesome they thought those were then when they couldn’t get to those things themselves and how lame they would be now. :)

    And since you mentioned Oregon trail, I have to share my story of how I was a student aid at a summer camp and would swap computers with the camp kids so that I could get my name on the high score board on every computer in the room (about 40 of them). It started random since I’d be on a different computer each day, but by the last few weeks I was actively seeking out the few computers left. I had kids rooting for me and others trying to knock me off. It was great fun. (and I did succeed)

    Posted 24 Jan 2008 at 11:36 am
  153. Paul wrote:

    Lauren,

    You are exactly spot on. Games teach the player in ways that fit naturally with the content and apply directly to the situation. James Paul Gee calls some of this “just-in-time” information. I believe and I’ve written about it, that we can make information literacy instruction “just-in-time.”

    In addition by looking at the strategies games like Mario Galaxy use to teach like: slowly building skills, adding on previous skills, keeping the challenge high enough to encourage the player to move forward, providing feedback along the way with each new star collected,and lowering the barriers of failure (how many extra lives can a player build up in some levels?).

    All of these strategies can and should be applied in our information literacy instruction.

    Posted 24 Jan 2008 at 2:39 pm
  154. Jenny Levine wrote:

    What he said.

    I talked with a guy last year who said he’d played videogames a lot in his youth but then moved away from them as he grew up. He recently tried them again and the thing that impressed him most about modern videogames is how they progressively teach you what you need to know in order to succeed and advance.

    In the “old days,” you had to spend hours figuring out what to do or you had to read the manual and hope. But today’s games assume you know nothing, throw you into situations, and then help you learn as you go so that you succeed. It’s another one of those things you don’t really understand unless you play games or someone tells you. Thanks for telling everyone. :)

    Posted 24 Jan 2008 at 8:52 pm
  155. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Paul & Jenny!

    It’s funny, even when playing the wii sports games, I didn’t *get* the whole learning-in-the-game dynamic. In fact, it took a few hours with SMGalaxy to put it together and to begin to trust the game to teach me. Like you’re saying, Jenny, it takes playing the game to really get that. Or hearing it from someone.

    And I love the “just-in-time” concept Paul. That’s dead on. People do learn best when they’re motivated, and “just-in-time” speaks to that.

    Posted 24 Jan 2008 at 10:42 pm
  156. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Molly! I really appreciate your point about how these perspectives shape our expectations in the work environment! I do think that is really interesting (and think it will be even more so as the workforce gains millennial workers).

    And Ellie, I’m with ya! I think it gives me some empathy for my older colleagues to be on the cusp. If it’s a little difficult for us to differentiate between encyclopedia and journal articles with college students… I’d imagine there’d be even more conceptual hurdles to jump if the technology all came after one graduated from college! Congrats on Oregon Trail! That’s an awesome story!

    Posted 24 Jan 2008 at 10:56 pm
  157. Michelle C wrote:

    I understand completely! It seems like, even when I am not “at work,” I constantly encounter ideas that I think might be good to incorporate into my work-life, and vice versa.

    Perhaps it is a sign that we truly enjoy our jobs. I remember having jobs that completely drained me, instead of energizing me, as my current one (usually) does. In those past positions, I tried not to think about work while at home.

    Posted 12 Feb 2008 at 9:26 am
  158. tim wrote:

    I find this particularly interesting as librarians seem to go one way or the other with almost no grey area in the middle. The bulk of my friends from library science school are the kind of people who are “all in.” They read library journals at home, they browse library related websites, they attend conferences, etc. However, there’s an entire compliment of librarians that I’ve met in the years since graduation who see their career as a nine-to-five thing (many are public librarians, by the way, though I’m not attempting to draw a conclusion by saying that).

    For me, the entire discussion gets even murkier when you begin considering subject librarians (which I’m one of) who work in very specialized fields (which I do), because it’s like having two distinct jobs – I’m viewed as a librarian and a genocide expert. This means that even if we are fully immersed (as I think I am), it might not be library science as such, but possibly a subject area that we cultivate in order to become even better experts at shepherding information.

    The conferences I attend, the presentations I give, the articles I write, and even the blogs I read, wind up being a fairly mixed lot of the two. On the surface, you’d think that everything I’m writing, attending, and presenting was simply Holocaust/genocide related – The Origins of Violence in Darfur, Finding Primary Sources for Holocaust Research, Following the Paper Trail of Modern Genocide — but in truth, they straddle that line between information and subject specialization.

    At the same time, you could just as easily find me at an Intellectual Freedom Committee meeting (state or national), which, now that I think about it, kind of bridges the gap as much as any of subject specific things I do.

    Posted 12 Feb 2008 at 1:41 pm
  159. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for your comments! Michelle, I know what you mean– I feel my work energizes me, too. I like that about library work. So much of it resonates with my larger world view that it just makes sense to have integrated some of it into my personal life.

    Tim, I think you make interesting points! I hadn’t thought of the potential to be a leading expert in a subject area (mine in Women’s and Gender Studies), but I can see how that could be the case, particularly in a field like yours. It sounds like you have very interesting work!

    Posted 14 Feb 2008 at 12:07 am
  160. Anna Creech wrote:

    I’m active in my day job as well as on a national professional level, but for most nights and weekends, I spend my time on other things. I have a wide array of interests that keep me busy outside of my working hours, and just like your professional activities, they can inform my work as well. These are not mutually exclusive lifestyle choices.

    Posted 14 Feb 2008 at 4:30 pm
  161. Anna Creech wrote:

    There’s a reason why I went with “eclectic” in my blog title. Don’t feel like you have to specialize just because some (or many) have done so. If you’re unhappy with your blog title, change it, but don’t feel like it has to also be your mission statement.

    Posted 14 Feb 2008 at 4:55 pm
  162. Anna Creech wrote:

    Gah! Would like an edit button, please. “Don’t feel like” in successive sentences… I can has grammer? kthxbye!

    Posted 14 Feb 2008 at 4:56 pm
  163. Kim Duckett wrote:

    I think that if you just focus on projects that interest you (and that you can get support for in your organization) you’ll just sort of fall into a niche — however narrow or broad. My title — Librarian for Digital Technology and Learning — is so broad I get to justify doing almost anything with it. Very cool. It also means I get pulled into all sorts of task forces — gotta watch that! I think you’ve got the same covered with “Instructional Design” librarian. With all your interests, that’s a great first job to have! So expansive!

    No need to change your blog title, imo…or go with something expansive rather than specialized.

    Posted 14 Feb 2008 at 6:59 pm
  164. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments… and reassurance! I guess I get so used to the conversations about specialization that I begin to see that as the One True Path. Eclectic and expansive interests and titles do have quite a few desirable qualities. Thanks for reminding me. :)

    Posted 16 Feb 2008 at 3:07 pm
  165. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hey, Anna. I didn’t mean that everyone has to spend ever waking minute of the day on library-related work. And I think we’re saying close to the same thing, just coming from different perspectives. For me, a lot of the involvement is a hobby and a diversion from the day-to-day library work. Broad involvement (being diverse hobbies or more focused in one area) means that there are more opportunities for interesting activity at any time. And, really, we can sometimes learn the most from things outside of the field. Everything enriches everything else. Thanks for your thoughts.

    Posted 16 Feb 2008 at 3:19 pm
  166. David Bigwood wrote:

    I’d not worry about using your name. It is your weblog. Weblogs reflect the person behind them. Nothing egocentric about putting your name up front. On a community weblog, like LISnews, it is different. It is also different on a work sponsored weblog.

    I’d think twice about changing the name. Will you confuse your readers? Prehaps lose some? What is to be gained by a name change?

    Posted 19 Feb 2008 at 7:13 pm
  167. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks David. I like that nuance; it makes sense.

    Posted 22 Feb 2008 at 9:12 pm
  168. amy wrote:

    TED talks are awesome. if you’re every cranky, watch Ze Frank’s talk.

    Posted 26 Feb 2008 at 6:08 pm
  169. lauren wrote:

    gah! i adore ze frank! thanks for the reminder! is this the one you were referring to?

    Posted 26 Feb 2008 at 7:36 pm
  170. amy wrote:

    that’s the one! love it love it love it

    Posted 01 Mar 2008 at 12:58 pm
  171. Michelle wrote:

    Lauren, I am so glad everything went well with your dad! I’m trying to make an effort to improve my diet and level of exercise myself.
    I’ll be interested in how the Virtual World conference goes, too, so will be on the lookout for folks who are blogging it.

    Posted 08 Mar 2008 at 7:57 am
  172. amy wrote:

    i’m playing with CoverItLive and live-blogging some of the sessions in SL. i’ll archive them to my site too – but if you’re online and want to check it out the live-blogging will start back up at 4pmSL.

    Posted 08 Mar 2008 at 6:37 pm
  173. morris wrote:

    I agree to some extent, facing the same situation this week with my MacBook Pro. But…

    As much as I would prefer to buy in store (for the instant gratification) I have to admit that Apple’s emphasis on acquainting newcomers to the brand with the ins and outs and whys (using way more in-store reps than previously) is a much better use of manpower than trying to customize at the store.

    The last time I was there it was quite amazing actually… all down the side were people sitting next to Apple reps learning about the Macs. There were families who seemed to have made coming an event, all the kids in tow. There was even a small crowd at the iTunes presentation going on at the back projector.

    Anyway, in the end, I think I prefer the store the way Apple’s done it as a showcase with most of the standard configuration products, rather than emulating factory/warehouse if you know what I mean.

    Posted 16 Mar 2008 at 10:08 am
  174. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Morris. Those are good points. I agree that it makes good sense for the to focus on those who don’t know/aren’t sold on Apple products. It just seemed strange to me that they can fix some internal problems in store and not upgrade a hard drive. Good to know I’m not the only one facing this situation with a MacBookPro this week. :)

    Posted 17 Mar 2008 at 8:50 pm
  175. Montgomery Lopez wrote:

    One of the things I remembered from my past MLIS class was how the library was not seen as a source of information due to, like you said “Information isn’t scarce any longer.” However, Google or other search engines are not the end all and be all information gathering. I agree with you that libraries and librarians serve a greater source by helping those patrons to find valid and accurate data.

    In addition, libraries need to expand itself to other services it can provide to the community it serves. Here in Miami, all libraries have tax forms and provide tax assistance through AARP volunteers every friday. When there is an issue to vote on, early voting can be done at libraries. As long as this trends continues and the needs are met, regardless of what happens to information gathering, the library will still be around for many generations to come.

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 9:22 am
  176. Kim Duckett wrote:

    Thanks for these thoughtful notes about the book.

    I agree with you that Wikipedia is a very useful tool for teaching students information literacy concepts. Most students — and most people — approach Wikipedia as consumers of the information with little clue about how the information even got there in the first place. I believe that even drawing students attention to the Discussion and History tabs can deepen their awareness of what’s going on in Wikipedia and (hopefully) use it more mindfully — or at least get a better grip on what all the fuss is about it. They’ve all heard they should be cautious about using Wikipedia and that anyone can create content, but most students and also faculty have never even noticed features of the wiki besides the Article tab itself. But peeking into the Discussion tab exposes the biases and struggles of the authors to attempt some sort of “neutral point of view” and the History tab reveals the anonymity of authors (and edit done by an IP address!). You can totally leverage the interest students have in Wikipedia to teach concepts such as peer review vs. the seemingly collective review happening in Wikipedia and discuss the pros and cons. I’ve also discussed the scholarly vs. popular dichotomy and then asked students to think about whether Wikipedia is scholarly or popular, neither or both while talking about the Wikipedia guidelines (NPoV, no original research, etc.) and showing them how the wiki works beneath the surface of what they read. Fascinating stuff! A whole arsenal of rich material for engaging students!

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 10:54 am
  177. Paul Pival wrote:

    I like it Lauren. I can’t tell which screencasting tool you’re using, but if Camtasia you could also go for a menu as in http://www.ucalgary.ca/lib-old/libcon/links/ (sorely in need of updating). Camtasia Studio 5 also allows you to pan and zoom automatically, good for showing URLs and such… You might also consider hosting somewhere other than YouTube to aid in readability – I like Viddler.com because it doesn’t compress nearly as much, thus rendering the videos much more legible.

    Posted 20 Mar 2008 at 2:35 pm
  178. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments! I agree. It’s really worth thinking about what services a library can provide for the local community. Tax assistance, early voting, etc. are great services from public libraries. Some of the information environment issues I discussed (I think) make a lot of sense within information literacy. It’s certainly an interesting time to be navigating changes and creating a new path!

    Posted 25 Mar 2008 at 9:07 pm
  179. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Paul! The site actually had examples from several different screencasting tools we’ve experimented with. Thanks for the advice on Camtasia 5. I need to upgrade.

    Also great tip about Viddler.com. We intentionally chose YouTube for the findablity factor, but there’s nothing to say we can’t post material in a different location for embedding as well. I’ll be sure to look into it.

    Great recommendations!

    Posted 25 Mar 2008 at 9:12 pm
  180. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hey Kim, thanks for your comments! I’m with you! I’ve actually gotten a fair amount of mileage out of Wikipedia at the reference desk, too. It’s amazing how a short one-on-one conversation about the tabs, works cited section, and a little bit about the Wikipedia culture can change how someone sees the source. It’s a great one, if it’s used thoughtfully. (Which is the key for most things, isn’t it?)

    Posted 25 Mar 2008 at 9:19 pm
  181. Lesley wrote:

    Wow, sounds like a great day! Looks like an impressive facility! Is ZSR planning a rennovation?

    Posted 26 Mar 2008 at 7:39 pm
  182. Steve Lawson wrote:

    That’s all well and good. But were they Hot, Hot, Hot!?

    Posted 26 Mar 2008 at 8:06 pm
  183. lauren pressley wrote:

    It was a great day! ZSR is planning to remodel our 24 hour study rooms and add a cafe/coffee shop. No immediate plans for the rest of the building, but we’re always interested in learning from others!

    & Steve… what a video!! Thanks for sharing!!

    Posted 26 Mar 2008 at 9:09 pm
  184. Jason Setzer wrote:

    I’m experimenting with screencasting and am struggling with how sterile it can feel. Any ideas about how librarians can communicate authenticity through video?

    Posted 27 Mar 2008 at 9:22 am
  185. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi, Jason. Isn’t that the question! I’m a fan of more conversational and less scripted, but I don’t (yet) have evidence that that method communicates authenticity. Are you having any luck?

    Posted 29 Mar 2008 at 4:03 pm
  186. Ann Viles wrote:

    Lauren, Thanks for sharing your notes about the visit to Appalachian and posting those great shots, especially the view from Special Collections. We enjoyed showing off our building and having a chance to talk with you about library services and buildings. We will be following your progress with interest and hope to hear from you as your plans for renovation develop.

    Posted 31 Mar 2008 at 5:47 pm
  187. Patrick Morton wrote:

    POWERBOOKS FTW!!
    OS 10.5.2 and Parallels running Vista Ultimate.. who could ask for anything more?!?

    Posted 08 Apr 2008 at 4:54 pm
  188. lauren pressley wrote:

    I don’t think anyone could. ;)

    Posted 11 Apr 2008 at 9:49 am
  189. Suresh Nair wrote:

    We need to shift – the message is clear. As regards to the importance of our profession – I am quite sure that its diminishing – how many knowledge or information management panels do have librarians as members? Are curicula has to change – include more techie items …. LIS teachers have a bigger role to play to keep our “so called profession” afloat.

    Posted 11 Apr 2008 at 9:49 am
  190. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments. I agree, there are some things in the basic LIS curriculum that need to change… starting with more emphasis on tech. I’d love to see more courses about how to evaluate new technology in light of a specific community, for one!

    Posted 11 Apr 2008 at 10:14 am
  191. Brian Mathews wrote:

    I feel you. Same thing happens with me. I take a day off and get maybe 2 hours of “book” work done. I did that for a year and had little to show for it. Now I just stay an extra hour at work and aim for a page a day — I also get up early 7:30ish on weekends to write for an hour and then snooze a little after that burst is gone.

    You’ll find the pace– just keep typing!

    Posted 11 Apr 2008 at 5:50 pm
  192. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Brian! This is good advice. I think that you’re onto something with the chipping away each day. I’ll have to attempt to get up a bit earlier tomorrow to see if I can make some kind of progress that way, too!

    Posted 12 Apr 2008 at 12:52 am
  193. Susan wrote:

    I had more success taking a full week off at a time for writing (3 weeks over a year). That enabled me to get more of a momentum going than a day at a time did. Of course, you also have to let the housework go and have a supportive husband to pick up the slack (which I know you do!). Keep plugging away.

    Posted 14 Apr 2008 at 8:21 pm
  194. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Susan! John and I actually were talking about how a week off might make more sense than five Fridays…. I’d have to wait until the semester is over, though! :) Very helpful!

    Posted 14 Apr 2008 at 10:47 pm
  195. Mary Scanlon wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    Thanks for sharing this Tech Therapy talk – I found it so interesting that I intend to listen to prior talks, as well.

    Mary

    Posted 15 Apr 2008 at 9:18 am
  196. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Mary! It really is a great series… I’m enjoying the Chronicle Podcasts in general.

    Posted 15 Apr 2008 at 4:02 pm
  197. Tara Fitz wrote:

    Great stuff! So many are so “stuck in the gerbil wheel” that if they jump off for 1 second to “learn something” there is an assumption, that it is better to keep running then stop for directions.

    I think if things can be shared in snippets (like this) there is more hope. Self-initiated learning goes a long way….sometimes we have to give people a snack rather than a 112 course meal
    (of information.)

    Posted 15 Apr 2008 at 9:56 pm
  198. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Tara, thanks for commenting! I’m with you on the snippets and self-initiated learning!

    Posted 22 Apr 2008 at 10:42 pm
  199. btuttle wrote:

    w00t!

    Posted 24 Apr 2008 at 4:54 pm
  200. Thomas Anglero wrote:

    Hi Lauren,

    I like what you wrote about the differences between kids and adults in the online world. Have you heard of a new online service that bridges the digital divide by providing every child with their own virtual laptop on a USB bracelet and while the child is surfing their protected by WiHood.

    http://www.WiHood.com

    More parents need to be informed about the available services that are out there to help them even when they are not home.

    Take care!

    Posted 25 Apr 2008 at 2:55 am
  201. Ian Mulvany wrote:

    Hi,

    I’m the product development manager for Connotea. Thank’s for trying us out. We are continually developing and improving features, but I’m particularly interested in where we can go to support university communities.

    If you have any feedback I’d love to hear it, you can contact me at i dot mulvany at nature dot com.

    - Ian

    Posted 25 Apr 2008 at 4:30 am
  202. ellie wrote:

    Thanks for sharing this!

    Posted 29 Apr 2008 at 11:06 am
  203. aaron wrote:

    okay, i really like the content of this post and i don’t want to detract from your message, but i just want to say that i was already planning on using futura medium for my passion quilt piece if i got around to it.

    re: the content. you’re right. libraries don’t exist in a vacuum. i sometimes wish that more librarians would realize that we need to evolve with the rest of the information world.

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 1:10 am
  204. Marianne wrote:

    I really like this, too. And it can also be applied on a personal level, as well: Are my actions as a library employee working towards the library system as a whole? Am I a good team member?

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 10:15 am
  205. lauren pressley wrote:

    Well, Aaron, I guess I need to tag you so that we can see how you were planning on using futura (if you get around to it)! I like font-minded folks. :)

    Thanks for extending the point, Marianne. I am there with you. I think systems thinking can be useful for both organizations and individuals.

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 11:10 am
  206. Sue Waters wrote:

    Welcome to the Comment Challenge Lauren. I also use co.mment to track my comments and feed it into my Google Reader. It’s had a big impact on my ability to respond to comments. I also use cocomment due to it’s community aspects.

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 6:50 pm
  207. Kimberly Brown wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    Welcome to the Comment Challenge. I’m working on the challenge as an individual and also with my class. We were busy today commenting to our blog partners all around the world. My students and I are always so excited when people read our blog posts. There is nothing more thrilling than receiving feedback on what you’ve written.
    I’ve never used co.mment but it sounds interesting.
    Kimberly
    a.k.a classroomqueen

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 7:00 pm
  208. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Sue and Kimberly! It looks like we’re in this exciting adventure together. :)

    Posted 02 May 2008 at 8:16 pm
  209. Marianne wrote:

    Lauren, I’m so glad you’re doing this, too!

    As far as those questions go, I hardly ever comment on other blogs. I read alot, but….I don’t know, I end up hitting the back button alot. Would that be something like Commenters Remorse? And I use Twitter too much. There, I said it.

    And I’d not kept up with my comments before I started using CoComment for the challenge. I’d started to do it on del.icio.us but it was kind of a pain. The CoComment browser extension does it for me though. Cool.

    Posted 03 May 2008 at 10:21 am
  210. Meredith wrote:

    Some people are such prolific commenters and I’m really impressed by that. If I’m interested in something enough to comment, I tend to do it on my own blog and just link back to their post. But some of my own posts get so many comments that I feel badly for not reciprocating. I guess that’s why I decided to do this challenge as well. It’s an awesome idea!

    Posted 03 May 2008 at 5:05 pm
  211. lauren pressley wrote:

    Haha, Commenter Remorse and too much Twitter, I am SO there, Marianne!

    I know what you mean, Meredith! So often I see my thoughts (or at least most of them) mentioned in the comments that I don’t add my own… and if my thoughts are particularly detailed or sufficiently different, I try to post and use trackback links. I’m glad you’re on board for the commenting challenge…. I think it’ll be a fun one. (I’ve already seen changes in my own blogging behavior because of it, fwiw!)

    Posted 04 May 2008 at 8:42 pm
  212. Sarah Hanawald wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    I’m not far from you–Greensboro, in fact. I’m really intrigued by your post. I have always thought of library people as the ultimate in detail orientation, but your post makes sense. I particularly like thinking about the library’s place in the community at large, which leads to my question for you, which is: how big does the picture get? Where is the point at which you have to stop expanding the circle ?

    I can’t figure out if I am a big picture or little picture person–I seem to vacillate wildly, depending on what is going on. Although in either case, I seem to head for the extreme side.

    Nice to “meet” you!
    Sarah

    Posted 04 May 2008 at 10:21 pm
  213. Greg wrote:

    No, thank you! Glad to see I’m not alone in seeing the potential for multiple styles of commenting. Kudos.

    Posted 08 May 2008 at 12:59 am
  214. Richard wrote:

    “They’re not moving away from that, but are thinking about rethinking the approach”

    Love that bit. Enjoyed your presentation too!

    Richard

    Posted 08 May 2008 at 9:08 am
  215. ellie wrote:

    Wonderful sentiment and perfect picture choice. I’ve really been enjoying following this meme.

    Posted 08 May 2008 at 10:26 am
  216. Karen wrote:

    If done right, I could see potential for this sort of technlogy in distance learning. As an example, a professor (or librarian) could post a lecture (or information literacy session) and then students could send back video comments or questions about various topics covered. This would ensure a more active communcative by-play, allowing students to feel more involved in the learning process (and perhaps better able to retain what they learn).

    I guess one concern might be the learning curve for this sort of technology; it isn’t for beginners. And, what is the point of an instructional technology session in which people spend most of the time resolving whatever technological bugs come their way?

    Another concern would be the volume of students (i.e. if 200 students are participating in the class remotely) and how to effectively manage their feedback.

    All in all, I think it has great potential!

    Posted 08 May 2008 at 7:20 pm
  217. lauren pressley wrote:

    thanks, ellie! i’m enjoying this meme, too!

    Posted 10 May 2008 at 12:10 am
  218. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks! Hopefully we can cross paths again, soon!

    Posted 10 May 2008 at 12:10 am
  219. lauren pressley wrote:

    Greg, expect video comments here soon! :)

    Karen, I think there’s good potential for video in distance learning, too! As far as learning curve, I’m guessing we’re a few years out from mainstream use, but for some computers it’s a seamless experience. Macs come with a built in camera now, so to make the comment I literally just clicked “record.” It would have been a hassle with my old Mac. I would have had to find my camera, make sure it was charged up, connect it to my computer, make sure the computer knew it was there, and *then* click record. In a few years I’m hoping/guessing the camera integration will be more widely adopted.

    As for the numbers, that would be a concern in a 200 person course! I can think of a few ways that could be potential answers, but all would require some sacrifice (in total watched, length of time, etc).

    Interesting comments! Thanks for bringing them up!

    Posted 10 May 2008 at 12:16 am
  220. Kenley Neufeld wrote:

    This is great Lauren. Thank you. The only trouble I’m having determining whether to include my home address (it’s public anyway, but…). Since nobody in Ojai is using Brightkite yet, there isn’t really a reason to include the street address. However, if I ever get trusted friends in Ojai, then I could include it so I show up in the “Around Me” tab.

    This site does take some mental grasping, but seems to have considerable power. One thing you forgot to mention was how important using SMS can be for managing your account. If you want to set your location and it is one of your placemarks, just send an text that says “@lax” and the cool thing is Brightkite sends you an SMS right back that tells you how many other users are in your location.

    So, for me the two areas to grow and learn about are SMS and privacy settings.

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 10:24 am
  221. Jenny Levine wrote:

    Thanks for posting about this, Lauren. I’ve been trying to figure out how I want to use BrightKite and how much, especially since (as you note) there aren’t good widgets for it yet.

    Right now, I’m trying to figure out how to friend you on BK. Any ideas? When I put in my username in “discover friends,” it says it couldn’t find anyone I know on the service, which is obviously baloney since you’re on both.

    Is the second graphic above the right one? Should it maybe show the “sharing” tab for Twitter?

    Again, thanks for sharing your thoughts about BK, and I hope to learn more from watching your use of it.

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 3:39 pm
  222. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments!

    Kenley, I know what you mean about home address. No one here (except for 2 people I invited, and trust) is on the service either, but I think a little bit about technosavvy people with bad intentions knowing exactly when I am out. My hope, there, is that they might know if I’m out, but they hopefully won’t know if *both* my husband and I are out. Thanks for adding the point about SMS! I’m still working out that aspect of the site, and didn’t even realize that I could find the number of users in the area using SMS. I’m using the iPhone interface, mostly, which is really nice, too. I wonder if since there is so much to learn that this service won’t catch on as much…

    Jenny, thanks for pointing out the picture issue! I’ll fix that right now! As for the discover friends, that could use some work. After poking around, it looks like the address bar at the top of the page can be used to find people, too:

    People Search - brightkite.com

    It’s an interesting experiment, for sure!

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 5:48 pm
  223. lauren pressley wrote:

    Update! It looks like BrightKite refreshes invites after so long… I have three again if anyone wants one!!

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 5:53 pm
  224. lauren pressley wrote:

    Sarah,

    Good to meet another local interested in this stuff! Libraries are evolving… while there are detail folks, there are other folks, too. It’s an interesting time to be in the profession! As for me, the picture is very large! I like to think in terms of the entire information ecosystem. Can someone in California access our information online? Can I find a copy of a rare book, that we don’t own, for a patron using Google Books? Where is the first place anyone goes for information… can we make a difference in that location. Of course, not everyone thinks in those terms, nor should they. But I do think that examining a system larger than the library building makes a lot of sense, particularly if you’re trying to reach people that don’t currently use library services, and also in light of the likelihood users are spending most of their information seeking time online.

    Good to meet you! I’m adding your blog to my reader!
    Lauren

    Posted 11 May 2008 at 7:09 pm
  225. Research Quest wrote:

    Would you be able to share more of the discussion about the brainstorming and planning you went through? What were some of the ideas that you came up with? How does your framework tie into the discipline you selected?

    Please let me know if you are able to talk more about your process.

    Paul

    Posted 16 May 2008 at 1:19 am
  226. Paula wrote:

    There is also a concept called the AIR Equation: the 3-part formula for happiness at http://www.AIRequation.org. The formula says happiness is based on 3 states of being, and to concentrate and building up ourselves and others in these areas.

    Posted 16 May 2008 at 6:08 pm
  227. Jennifer Breazeale wrote:

    Thanks for the post! I just started checking out BrightKite last week and I wondered how everyone was sending their posts to Twitter – now I know! The trick now is to get more people who are actually my “friends” to sign up and start using it.

    Posted 19 May 2008 at 10:37 am
  228. Bobbi wrote:

    Thanks for posting this. I got my invite a week or two ago but haven’t spent much time on it. I’m pretty sporadic on Twitter, though so I don’t know if I’ll get hooked on brightkite, but I’m off to revisit it!

    Posted 19 May 2008 at 3:55 pm
  229. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Jennifer & Bobbie! I’m glad it’s helpful. It’s true… the trick really is to get more friends to use it. Hope to see you there!!

    Posted 19 May 2008 at 4:22 pm
  230. Mary wrote:

    Ok, so, oddly enough I was just talking with John (..my John) about life in general, and I think that this applies. Gonna have to try and implement.

    Posted 21 May 2008 at 4:10 pm
  231. lauren wrote:

    Yeah, it really does, doesn’t it!? Sounds like a plan!

    Posted 22 May 2008 at 12:31 pm
  232. Md. Roknuzzaman wrote:

    I’m reading your paper entitled “Social Epistemology in LIS”. It is an interesting and useful paper for the readers of both disciplines. For my research purpose, I would like to use your paper as a reference. Would you please provide me the bibliographical details of your paper? I would highly appreciate your cooperation.

    Posted 27 May 2008 at 1:34 am
  233. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Md.Roknuzzaman! Sure, you can use it as a reference. What bibliographical details are you looking for? I submitted it as part of a graduate program, so I suspect you could treat it as a white paper…

    Posted 27 May 2008 at 4:45 pm
  234. Kenley Neufeld wrote:

    Technically, gMail is still in beta and institutions of higher education are switching all their mail services to this beta product. Who would have thought?

    Thinking, analyzing, planning all have their place but at some point you just have to do it. In some institutions one can spend so much time with those steps that you miss out on the opportunity to be innovative. To be exciting. To have a pulse. I want to have a pulse and I want the organization I work for to have one too.

    Posted 27 May 2008 at 11:53 pm
  235. Md. Roknuzzaman wrote:

    Okay, Lauren.

    I appreciate your sharp response!

    Thanking you.

    Posted 28 May 2008 at 12:06 am
  236. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hey Kenley, good point re: gMail!

    I’m with you on the exciting/pulse/innovation line of thinking. Innovation is one of my primary motivators, and I’m a big fan of trying out new things and seeing how they go.

    Lately I’ve been wrestling with the issue of assessment and planning. I see some colleagues in the field looking for more processes and plans for implementation of services they plan to use, which makes me think that there are less “culture of beta” people than I might have expected. I’m trying to figure out how to bridge their work needs with the “culture of beta” idea.

    I also see great value in focus groups and having conversations with our users, so I am thinking a lot about that, too. However, I think that a lot of those conversations and focus groups can meet around new services and projects as they arise, not slowing down the process in the planning phase.

    I particularly like your “I want to have a pulse and I want the organization I work for to have one too.” Amen to that!

    Posted 29 May 2008 at 8:23 pm
  237. Susan wrote:

    Congratulations, Lauren! You should be very proud to accomplish this. Love the glossy graphics too! I’m a sucker for using them to bring attention to good content. Way to go, Susan

    Posted 03 Jun 2008 at 5:42 pm
  238. lauren wrote:

    Thanks, Susan! The graphics are a fun touch. Very different feel to reading than reading the Word doc I submitted! :)

    Posted 03 Jun 2008 at 10:12 pm
  239. Lori Reed wrote:

    We’re not here yet but here’s what I envision. Removing large reference desks and reclaiming that space for the public or just putting up a small staff kiosk. Staff connected with wireless headsets and PDAs or tablet PCs roaming or on call from their work areas.

    In the far future we may have walk up terminals with voice recognition where patrons can ask questions and the computer will answer or if it can’t answer transfer to a librarian…kind of like what happens now when you call a bank or insurance company.

    I’m not saying any of this is better or worse. It’s just different and we have to be willing to explore new territories to stay relevant and vital to the communities.

    Posted 03 Jun 2008 at 10:28 pm
  240. Lori Reed wrote:

    Congratulations! That is such a great feeling! I can’t wait to read it.

    Posted 03 Jun 2008 at 10:32 pm
  241. Kelley wrote:

    Hi Lauren

    Was trying to subscribe to your blog – but got a whacky error message – not sure if it was me or you, but thought I’d let you know in case something’s busted on the blog. : )

    Posted 04 Jun 2008 at 8:41 am
  242. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Kelley,

    I think I’ve fixed the problem… Thanks for letting me know!!

    Lauren

    Posted 26 Jun 2008 at 10:57 am
  243. tim wrote:

    I still belong to ALA (as well as VLA: Virginia Library Association) but I’m not as involved as I used to be because I went from being an academic librarian, which was well served by individual divisions and round tables, to my current position, which is a redheaded-stepchild if there ever was one.

    Posted 27 Jun 2008 at 7:44 pm
  244. Robin Hastings wrote:

    Sorry I missed you at the Lita Happy Hour. After I’d had a drink or two, I sat down in a corner with some new friends and stopped circulating. I’m thinking I missed a bunch of twitter peeps because of that!

    Posted 28 Jun 2008 at 11:35 am
  245. Karin Dalziel wrote:

    I totally agree about twitter. It helped me meet up with people, decide what sessions to go to (or NOT go to) and even helped me win a $100 B&N gift card. All in all, a HUGE SUCCESS- even with the service going down periodically.

    It was nice to meet you, BTW. :)

    Posted 02 Jul 2008 at 11:07 am
  246. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Karin! You’re right… can’t beat the $100 B&N card! It was good to meet you, too! :)

    Posted 02 Jul 2008 at 11:53 am
  247. Lila wrote:

    Lauren,

    Thanks for the post. Note, though, that “Jim” O’Neill is actually “Jill.” :-)

    Also, one question: In what context did Harvey Gover mention the NAL “Blue Print for Success”? I’m not quite seeing the connection between that paper and a discussion of distance learning, other than that it includes the quote from Jill O’Neill.

    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 10:48 am
  248. Julie wrote:

    Hey that’s a totally fun idea. I think I’ll join in!

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 9:07 am
  249. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Lila… I’ve corrected it… serves me right for relying on my hearing rather than asking for names for the blog post!

    Harvey had very positive remarks for the NAL “Blue Print for Success.” As you can probably tell from the program notes, the program was about the nature of distance learning today. Many traditional students expect access to the same services that distance service students have, which often means more librarians embracing technology that used to be primarily for distance students. I can’t remember exactly what he said about the report, but, for example pages 26-27 talk about technology investments over the next five years. Full text and enhanced online catalogs are important to both distance and local students. Is this helpful?

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 9:28 am
  250. Jezmynne Westcott wrote:

    Count me in! : )

    jez~

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 1:50 pm
  251. Matthew Hamilton wrote:

    Hi Lauren,

    Thanks for highlighting this, I hadn’t read Librarian by Day before (new feed added to my GReader) but I especially love this idea. Since I have an unusual position it’s always great to see what other folks are doing with their time and how they manage it all. I can’t wait to see the results!

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 2:04 pm
  252. Bobbi Newman wrote:

    I’m so excited to see this idea taking off! I was thrilled to see that Lori put the wiki together, I should have been doing that instead of playing videos games this morning. Now I just have to get added to it LOL

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 2:26 pm
  253. lauren pressley wrote:

    Yay! So glad to see this idea resonates with so many people! Looking forward to reading the posts!

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 7:16 pm
  254. Sara wrote:

    Everyone likes to know what other people do, so I’m not surprised it’s so popular already. I’m looking forward to it!

    Posted 09 Jul 2008 at 7:27 pm
  255. Ellie wrote:

    I’ll be playing along :)

    Posted 12 Jul 2008 at 2:23 pm
  256. Karin Dalziel wrote:

    I’m really enjoying these posts, and am so glad you participated. :) It is really great to see what professional librarians do throughout the day. I especially like your focus on your task system, because mine needs a major overhaul. I need all the hints I can get.

    Posted 14 Jul 2008 at 9:13 pm
  257. Lori Reed wrote:

    I’m so glad you participated. It was an atypical week for a lot of us which is good. I think we should do this quarterly/every season.

    Posted 18 Jul 2008 at 8:03 pm
  258. Rebecca wrote:

    I am so glad that this meme/project has been started. For those of us that are starting a career in libraries, it is very helpful. My question is sort of a pros and cons type of question. I haven’t fully decided which avenue I want to take with my MLS program…public or academic. Would you mind giving me a rundown of some pros and cons of your academic setting?

    Thanks!
    Becca in Indiana

    Posted 19 Jul 2008 at 5:55 pm
  259. Janet Clarey wrote:

    I think technology is probably the trigger. It influences how organizations will spend money and direct resources. So, if an organization is seeing online social media as a competitive advantage in attracting younger workers (perhaps because they’ve read they’re all on Facebook), then they’ll naturally attach the media.

    I’ve never been a big fan of lumping people into categories either. I just think the link is strategically-driven.

    Posted 29 Jul 2008 at 2:41 pm
  260. ellie wrote:

    This is great! Thanks for sharing.

    Posted 31 Jul 2008 at 6:58 pm
  261. Jenny wrote:

    Ooh, do I see our NetVibes portal in there?? This is great!

    Posted 01 Aug 2008 at 11:13 am
  262. Giz Womack wrote:

    Lauren, great post! I’m interested in the fact that the presentation rehearsal space could only be booked by students! I really like the idea of having students do research projects on the Library!

    Posted 01 Aug 2008 at 2:43 pm
  263. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Giz! I’m with ya, saving the presentation room is a great idea… and I’m all for student projects that teach them skills and have real world possibilities. Love the idea!

    Posted 05 Aug 2008 at 10:35 pm
  264. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, @ellie!

    @Jenny, you do, indeed! This group liked the idea, too, though for a totally different purpose!

    Posted 05 Aug 2008 at 10:36 pm
  265. lauren pressley wrote:

    Whew, quite a question. It could be an entire blog post in itself. Would you mind shooting me an email? lauren@laurenpressley.com These last few weeks (and coming 2) have been crazy, but I’ll try to get in touch as soon as possible.

    Posted 05 Aug 2008 at 10:52 pm
  266. lauren pressley wrote:

    @karin, it was good to see what you were up to, too. If you ever want to talk task management, tweet, email, or IM me! :)

    Posted 05 Aug 2008 at 10:53 pm
  267. DerikB wrote:

    When I first read the title of this post I thought it was about making beer and realized maybe I’ve been going to the wrong conferences.

    Posted 09 Aug 2008 at 9:55 am
  268. lauren pressley wrote:

    Haha, that would be a great conference! :)

    Posted 10 Aug 2008 at 10:52 am
  269. Joan Vinall-Cox wrote:

    Glad you found it worthwhile. Thanks for posting about it without mentioning the wireless problems;->

    Posted 10 Aug 2008 at 7:14 pm
  270. Carol wrote:

    The picture shows two people taking notes while a presenter talks over a bulleted PowerPoint. That seems ironic to me since he was apparently talking about how irrelevant lectures are. You said that some presenters used clickers, and that some sessions were only 15 minutes long. Besides that, was there evidence that presenters were themselves employing some of these new techniques to engage you? Just wondering, since this was a conference about new teaching techniques.

    Posted 11 Aug 2008 at 10:00 am
  271. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hey Carol, this photo was taken as the speaker gave an overview in preparation for collaborative work. That being said, plenty of presenters (us included for this conference) gave lectures. This is pretty standard for education conferences in my experiences.

    Most people who are in academia excelled in a traditional-lecture based environment. They wouldn’t have gone on to grad school if they didn’t. But then, as we teach, we realize that a majority of students aren’t like us, and most don’t pay attention to the lecture-style format. So, perhaps ironically, a lot of education presentations are given in lecture format to best reach the audience, while the topic might be about using newer methods. Some speakers, like the one above, lecture enough to get the (more traditional) audience on board, but then move in to a modeling mode, demonstrating newer methods to make their point. However, I’ve seen a lot of more traditional faculty get very frustrated in these sessions, so it’s kindof a gamble.

    An interesting issue, though!

    Posted 11 Aug 2008 at 2:22 pm
  272. Meredith wrote:

    Great observations! I SO agree with the low periods and high periods and it’s so important to capitalize on those highs to really get some good work done. Editing sucks. I don’t think anyone is very good at editing themself, which is why it’s so important to have other people looking at it (though they’re not always right either — I mostly agreed with my editor, but I totally disagreed with many of the edits my copy editor made). Just remember that it’s your name on the work and don’t let anyone turn it into something you don’t believe in.

    I think everyone’s different when it comes to writing something so huge. Some people can do that “I’ll write 500 words every day” thing and get a little bit done each day consistently. I’m one of those people who needs a good, long, uninterrupted period of time to write. When I did my book, I tended to do research and organize my thoughts during the week and then I’d actually write an entire chapter in the course of a weekend. I found this helped to make each chapter pretty cohesive and it kept my attention. I can’t write with distractions and I need to be “in the zone” or I can’t write at all. I envy people who can just sit down and write for a bit before work or after work; I’m not in the right headspace at those times.

    Best of luck on getting totally done! It’s an amazing feeling to print out the whole damn thing and just look at what you’ve accomplished. YAY! :)

    Posted 15 Sep 2008 at 7:21 pm
  273. Kay wrote:

    Lauren,

    If you are interested in “association” via wiki, the Foresight Education Project has just been launched at the U of Houston, home to the longest running Master’s program in foresight education.

    Check it, kay, aka Professor Wantanabe :)

    Posted 17 Sep 2008 at 4:53 pm
  274. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Meredith! It’s interesting how similar and different people’s experiences can be. I like your idea of research throughout the week, and writing on the weekend. At the end of the day, some days, my brain seems to stop working on detail grammar issues. I’m looking forward to getting there. It’s gonna be nice! :)

    Posted 17 Sep 2008 at 5:27 pm
  275. Ken wrote:

    Another good biblio social network site is MyBookLog.com

    Posted 22 Sep 2008 at 4:18 pm
  276. Peter Bromberg wrote:

    Hi Lauren,

    Nice presentation. I love the look of it–great design aesthetics. How did you create the photoalbum photo look? Well done! :-)

    Posted 24 Sep 2008 at 3:24 pm
  277. lauren wrote:

    Hi Peter– Thanks! I used Keynote (on the Mac). In fact, these days I make most of my presentations in Keynote, and export them in some format that will work on a PC. :)

    Posted 25 Sep 2008 at 4:43 pm
  278. Bobbi Newman wrote:

    I’ve noticed the same things lately. While I know I’m still productive I’m frustrated with myself for being so easily distracted & check FF & Twitter so often when I should be working on a presentation. I’ve pretty much done what you described set aside time for Facebook, FriendFeed & Twitter and tried to stop checking them so often. I’m interested in how it works for you and for me. I wonder if we were Digital Natives if it would even bother us? I think it wouldn’t it would just be part of our day & how we operate. Is that good or bad? I don’t know.

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 8:21 am
  279. jezmynne westcott wrote:

    i absolutely know where you are coming from, and it’s a dichotomy I struggle with, as well. I know that social networks take care and feeding… read, react, think, add, participate… but sometimes I’m just too busy or wrapped up. Sometimes I’ll check my txt and have 200+ tweets, which I’ll scan and delete, since it’s hard to react to something someone said 12 hours ago. Sometimes I’ll think of something to add, but there’s already 12 plus comments on Friend Feed, or someone else offered up the same tidbit. Does it make me feel out of the loop? Yes. But what do I do about it? Keep up the best I can, and jump in on the party line when I’ve got them time.

    Keep us posted on how your “twitstriction” goes. : )

    jez~

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 9:58 am
  280. Lori Reed wrote:

    I so totally know where you are coming from. Multitasking is overrated. I try to limit twitter and FF to nights when I am at home, but there are times when I need the feedback and opinions of colleagues while I’m at work.

    If you use Outlook I highly recommend the book Take Back Your Life. When I followed that book I was the most productive ever and I only checked email twice a day.

    My mentor constantly reminds me to focus on accomplishments not tasks.

    Good luck!

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 10:21 am
  281. DerikB wrote:

    Lauren, I’ve been working on similar things. I’ve given up looking at FriendFeed totally and started paring down Twitter followings.

    If you aren’t already, you should be reading Merlin Mann’s 43 Folders. He’s been writing a lot of about similar issues lately. http://www.43folders.com/

    The irony of recommending another thing to read to help you get more done is not lost on me.

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 11:18 am
  282. Bettina wrote:

    Lauren, I have been thinking the same. I was totally not myself, when I had to turn in my laptop for repairs and had no internet for two weeks.
    And worst of all, new restricted internet policies at work make it impossible for us to use the internet or email accounts for private purposes at work, without risking your job. And hey, I work in media after all! It still makes us really mad, because you are totally cut off until you get home at night and switch on your own laptop, to follow up with your private life. So, just checking mails and readers turns into 1 hour.

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 3:07 pm
  283. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for the comments! I’ll look into Take Back Your Life, and into 43Folders. (I’d been keeping up with the conversation there, but cut the feed a few months back… looks like I’ll add it back to my reader!)

    Glad to know that I’m not alone. I look forward to seeing what works for you all, and I’ll post about my Twitter diet after I’ve been on it a while and have noticed a change (one way or the other).

    Posted 30 Sep 2008 at 5:37 pm
  284. Dana wrote:

    Lauren,

    Great post. I’m way behind in my blog reading so missed the survey. But I would say it sounds like you’re on the right track. While we do have a duty to help students in the here and now to be able to use our resources and succeed in their academic career, the simple fact is that without a solid base of theoretical skills like critical evaluation, knowing the practical stuff like the where and how of searching library resources can be rendered useless.

    The real challenge as I see it is making the theoretical stuff interesting and relevant, and making sure students have the chance to put those theories to practical use so they can see the real-life value of learning them. This is very hard when not given the benefit of a semester-long course (which I don’t have). As you point out – the time issue is always the one that forces us to sacrifice a lot of theoretical stuff…

    Peace,
    Dana

    Posted 04 Oct 2008 at 6:39 pm
  285. Bobby wrote:

    I read about a site on John Chow’s blog today called http://www.43marks.com – its like Pageflakes and iGoogle but better cuz you can add you all your bookmarks and the bookmarks can be websites not just gadgets and RSS feeds although you can upload your favorite RSS feeds too. Its free and totally customizable re-arranging categories and bookmarks in anyway you want. I really do like 43marks much better. It’s great for teachers! They give you a unique URL (43MARKS.com/username) where you can upload bookmarks that are of interest to the class your teaching Just give out the URL so the the whole class can see the bookmarks

    Posted 18 Oct 2008 at 7:12 am
  286. joan wrote:

    Lauren, what a great post. I tried hard to adapt GTD for my work. Part of the problem is that I like compartmentalizing work and home, at least in email and to-do lists, and GTD seemed better suited to people who melded work and life together, or who worked from home (though this may be a mis-read on my part).

    What I did take from GTD was the concept of having a capture. I now carry around a moleskin that I use for my work/life/errands capture. Before I always felt like I was forgetting something. I would go to the store and have no idea what I really needed. Now I organize these jumbled thoughts as soon as I remember them: my notebook has sections for work to do, life to do, stuff to buy, long term dreams/goals (the someday list), and blog ideas. This way, if I think of a home thing at work, I jot it down. If I think of something I need to buy when I’m commuting, I jot it down. I never take the next step of really organizing this stuff, except that when I get to work I transfer any notes into my work system. This is what has worked for me: having it all in one place instead of maintaining multiple lose-able lists. And I have almost completely lost that feeling that I’ve forgotten something. I think my memory has even improved.

    About two weeks ago I started using Remember the Milk, integrated into my gmail. It’s fantastic. Before I was committed to a paper to-do list for work, but I really like how I set priorities and due dates in RTM, and then it’s right in front of my face. I find it harder to ignore my most important tasks with RTM.

    Posted 25 Nov 2008 at 6:32 am
  287. DerikB wrote:

    I use some combination of systems. I work on keeping down the number of things I expect to do; I usually base it on the week. What do I need to get done this week? I’ve learned to give myself fewer things than I think I can get done, because so many little things (reference questions) tend to come up unplanned.

    Posted 25 Nov 2008 at 10:33 am
  288. Gareth wrote:

    I just opened Thinking Rock up (GTD software) and created a project called ‘Life’ ;)

    This is my second look at this software and I realise now that you don’t have to capture every single thought you have, but instead just use it as useful project software, where you can work on projects that you plan to do in the future as well.

    Still looking at it but I may use.

    Posted 25 Nov 2008 at 11:27 am
  289. Karin Dalziel wrote:

    I too have been rethinking my “system” lately- though I never fully implemented GTD. Like Joan, I was never quite happy with merging my work and personal to-do’s, and never quite got around to the weekly review. I also found I was adding a lot of tasks that just weren’t important to the to do list.

    I have been doing the 3 important tasks thing the last two weeks and It’s been helping a LOT. Not only because it forces me to sit down and take stock of what is important at the start of the day, but because I have a focused reason to give people when they wonder why I can’t do their Very Important Task RIGHT AWAY.

    Since I’m done with school in December, I’m also planning to do a major overhaul of my filing and organizational systems to get me in gear for a new job, new responsibilities, and new professional development goals.

    Posted 26 Nov 2008 at 1:21 pm
  290. Carol wrote:

    There’s something in the GTD book about “cleaning the garage, but not today.” The point was that you didn’t have to do everything on your list. I like GTD because it enables me to make sure that the little things — like filling out a vacation form — don’t drop through the cracks. I still haven’t gotten to the point where I feel that I’m making a lot of progress on some old projects, but that’s OK. I know the really important stuff is getting done.

    Maybe we should have a productivity/GTD rap session at the library some day. (But don’t feel like I’ve just put another thing on your list!)

    Posted 26 Nov 2008 at 5:57 pm
  291. joan wrote:

    Lauren, I marked this post to read later, and finally just did.

    This is exactly the conversation we’ve been having at my university regarding our semester-long class. The problem I’m having is that we have a unified curriculum, and while my inclinations are more towards your thinking, that is not necessarily the same for my colleagues. This semester we had students submit written assignments via individual blogs through WordPress. There was a bit of a learning curve early in the semester, but by the end of the semester, it seems they enjoyed it. But my colleagues want to do away with it the blog and have students submit assignments via Blackboard. Our class isn’t about blogging, but I feel they learn so much by having to do their homework via blogs.

    I did have some success with this during our session on news sources. We talked about Google News, Lexis Nexis, and Library Press Display. They got the concept that they can use Google News most of the time (and it’s better than a regular Google search), but that Lexis Nexis is where they should go for comprehensive searches or when they aren’t allowed to use the internet for an assignment. Framing it in those terms seemed to help them get it.

    A like-minded colleague and I are both teaching a winter session version of our class, one hour a day for about three weeks. It’s a time for us to experiment more with this newer approach. At the end of this semester, I was disappointed to realize our students still couldn’t differentiate between a website, a PDF, and a journal collection online. I like the idea of teaching life-long skills, even at the expense of library resources.

    Posted 01 Dec 2008 at 8:01 am
  292. lauren pressley wrote:

    Interesting comments! I think a common theme here is that we all take the aspects of different time management systems that are most useful in our own contexts. Joan & Karin, the combined personal/work tasks is something I feel resistance to, too. But I think in my situation it’s better that way (otherwise, I forget all about the personal tasks that have to be done and just focus on the work list). Derik, I’m with you… I am having a hard time understanding just how much is realistic, but I am realizing that it’s a lot less than I thought it was! & Carol, maybe we do need a rap session! I won’t put it on my list now, but I’ll file it away in my staff development folder for the next committee meeting. ;)

    Posted 01 Dec 2008 at 11:48 pm
  293. lauren pressley wrote:

    Joan! It sounds like we’re having a lot of similar discussions at our respective places of work! I’m interested in how your class goes. With a like-minded colleague you’re sure to be able to do some interesting work! If you want to trade ideas sometime, just let me know!

    Dana, I think you’re right… the semester long course makes it much easier to approach some of these topics. With a one-shot library instruction session, you have to make the faculty member happy with what you’re teaching, and they might have different ideas about the research skills they want their students to have. For what it’s worth, I often work in things like RSS by comparing them to the Facebook news feed or talk about alerts using google news alerts for personal names to make journal/database alerts more interesting. The trick (for me) is finding out what’s interesting enough to the students to provide a hook for the research skills and theories. :)

    Posted 01 Dec 2008 at 11:57 pm
  294. Mary Beth wrote:

    Great info, Lauren. You are singing my song. I’ll be sure to share my paper when its done.

    Posted 03 Dec 2008 at 10:21 pm
  295. George wrote:

    Whenever this question comes up, I can’t help but think about one of the cousins to the reference desk — namely, the customer service department of a typical business. I can think of nothing more frustrating for me as a consumer than to contact a business with a question that requires thought and judgment only to find a slug on the other end of the transaction who automatically refers me to an inscrutable Web site. Based on such evidence from business, it is likely that many libraries will use the changing nature of the reference desk as a cover for providing less service. Maybe one question to ask is what standards of old-fashioned reference need to be transferred to new technology?

    Posted 04 Dec 2008 at 7:40 am
  296. Joe Kraus wrote:

    We (at the U of Denver) changed our “Reference Desk” name to the Research Help Desk, and students understand that terminology a little bit better. We also changed our service model to just have grad students (LIS for the most part) work at the Research Help Desk, while the reference librarians schedule 30-60 min consultations for the more in-depth questions.

    In August of 2008, BCR and RUSA sponsored a conference called the Reference Renaissance. I was not able to attend, but this (and other) PowerPoints might be of interest — Amelia Brunskill, Dickinson College, PA, “The Desk is Gone” — http://www.bcr.org/referencerenaissance/docs/BrunskillReferenceRenaissanceFinal.ppt

    Tootles, Joe

    Posted 04 Dec 2008 at 12:40 pm
  297. lauren pressley wrote:

    Mary Beth: I can’t wait to see the paper!!

    George: Good points. I especially like your last question. I do think a lot of this is institution specific. Laurie left a good point on my Facebook about how her public library has a very busy reference desk (with questions we just don’t get). I agree, the stereotypical customer service, refer to a website, have a horrible experience, is something we don’t want to imitate. But with evidence that a lot of college library users want to help themselves, I think a really well designed library website (with built-in excellent training materials) can help, particularly if the web design process includes usability testing… which I wish more places would do in general. :)

    Joe: I love the terminology change, much more user-centered! I also think that your grad model/consultations is a good one. We use a consultation model in addition to the ref desk hours, and our consultation stats are increasing at an amazing rate. I think we might see this emerge as a practice standard. Thanks for reminding me about the Reference Renaissance. I’ll check out the powerpoint right away!

    Posted 05 Dec 2008 at 12:00 am
  298. Rachel wrote:

    Ditto! I’ve had a Sony eReader for 6 months, and the 4 libraries I belong to are useless for content – I’ve talked to them all about it, and in the “ebook” category they are all choosing to focus on audiobooks in various formats. One is even a member of NCDL, but there’s just not much to choose from there. I read the free ebooks that are mostly in the sci-fi and fantasy genres (those authors seem to understand free content), but will end up using the eReader mostly to read purchased ebooks when I travel, rather than taking 6-8 hardbacks from a library. It’s quite frustrating – I have this *great* tool that I really like and can’t use as much as I’d like to. (I chose the eReader over the Kindle to avoid being tied to Amazon-only content.)

    Posted 05 Dec 2008 at 10:58 am
  299. Emily wrote:

    I’m in library school at the moment and I was wondering if anyone thinks that the reference desk will use webcams at some point to conduct reference interviews?

    We use email and instant messaging so it seems that to use technology at its fullest for a perfect technology-orientated interview we would use webcams.

    Thanks! I really enjoyed reading your blog and comments :)

    Posted 05 Dec 2008 at 2:56 pm
  300. lauren pressley wrote:

    Emily, good point! Char Booth is doing some interesting work using Skype for reference at Ohio University. I often wonder if it would be useful for our study abroad students.

    For what it’s worth, the students I talk to say they don’t call the reference desk from the library because of the noise they would make on the phone. I think that they would have a similar reaction to using video within the library. However, from residence halls, apartments, and other countries, it could be a good fit.

    Thanks for your comment!

    Posted 08 Dec 2008 at 12:46 am
  301. lauren pressley wrote:

    Rachel, I’m glad I’m not alone! You’re right, it does seem like the scifi and fantasy authors are there much faster than the rest. Hopefully it’s like the sciences and the ejournals (that got there so much faster, but paved the way for other disciplines).

    Posted 08 Dec 2008 at 12:48 am
  302. Meredith wrote:

    Good luck with these new projects! I’ll definitely be keeping an eye on the Instructional Tech one. It’s a shame that it’s usually the staff development stuff that goes by the wayside when we get too busy with other things, but obviously, services to patrons have to come first.

    Posted 17 Dec 2008 at 9:19 am
  303. Steve Casburn wrote:

    Lauren: Thanks for the Stanza recommendation! I have downloaded it to my iPhone and it looks promising!

    Posted 24 Dec 2008 at 3:29 am
  304. Million wrote:

    I can’t say much about Google Books (haven’t really kept abrest of it lately), but I have mixed feelings about the Life Archive. I just hope they don’t rely on digitization to preserve everything. I mean, Google has some awesome search alagorithms, and lots of money to ensure everything stays well-maintained, but part of me is afraid that they are going to treat the archive as just more stuff to crawl.

    Here’s to hoping that they avoid that “evil” thing you talk about. For better or worse they are the public shepherd to a cultural treasure.

    Posted 05 Jan 2009 at 4:20 pm
  305. Maurice Coleman from T is for Training wrote:

    Laura, could you come on the next T is for Training and talk about Instructional Design? Every other friday at 2 eastern. Next one on 30th. Love if you could come and talk about id. Thanks.

    http://tisfortraining.wordpress.com

    Posted 16 Jan 2009 at 5:55 pm
  306. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Maurice, that would be fun! Looking forward to it! Anything I should plan on ahead of time?

    Posted 18 Jan 2009 at 2:13 pm
  307. Neelima wrote:

    It would be nice if academic libraries could work with their respective campus bookstores to provide textbooks in digital formats that students could “rent” for the semester at a cost that is more reasonable than purchasing the book (which is usually relevant for one semester, anyway).

    Posted 22 Jan 2009 at 4:57 pm
  308. Mary wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    Thanks for your great posts! I wasn’t able to attend MidWinter this year but have enjoyed keeping up vicariously through you and Susan.

    Posted 29 Jan 2009 at 9:31 am
  309. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Mary! I hope we’ll meet up at another conference, soon!

    Posted 31 Jan 2009 at 8:15 pm
  310. DerikB wrote:

    The probably with Twitter as primary conference communicator is for those who don’t attend or follow in real time and for the archive. Blog posts can be found, saved, tagged, commented, etc. Tweets tend to disappear if you don’t see them right away.

    I would hope all the twittering would lead to better post-conference thoughtful blog posts, but I’m not sure that’s the case.

    Posted 09 Feb 2009 at 10:30 am
  311. BacarliW wrote:

    Thanks for this blog Lauren. I also love GTD! I found Outlook Track-It through it. It’s a small toolbar for outlook that reminds you to followup to emails. easy to use! hope you have some info on that.

    Posted 12 Feb 2009 at 2:27 am
  312. brian wrote:

    Not sure if you read Wired, but current issue has good article and some cool apps. It’s a good read: http://www.wired.com/gadgets/wireless/magazine/17-02/lp_10coolapps

    Posted 16 Feb 2009 at 10:59 am
  313. Linda Thompson wrote:

    I agree that this is the future. The costumer service is very important. and some
    people need a human not just a machine.

    Posted 16 Feb 2009 at 3:15 pm
  314. Tom Adamich wrote:

    Hi, Kristen:

    Thanks for all of the good work you are doing as co-chair of the LITA Distance Learning Interest Group.

    I have the pleasure of working on the following. Would you evaluate and consider sharing this information with both LITA Distance Learning Interest Group members and others associated with distance education within your scope (either via list post or other means)? It would be excellent to have a number of research examples/best practices from the LITA membership to include in the issue. Please let me know if you have questions:

    *** Call for Papers ***
    Issue #21 – case studies/best practices of use of technology in instruction which may involve interaction with libraries (both physical and virtual) and librarians

    Publish your research papers, position papers, or practice abstracts, and book reviews in this international refereed journal.
    The International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education publishes articles, papers, manuscripts, and book reviews promoting the advancement of teaching with technology at all levels of education encompassing all domains of learning. The primary mission of the IJICTE is to serve as a medium for introducing, collaborating, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating new and innovative contributions to the theory, practice, and research of technology education applicable to K-12 education, higher education, and corporate and proprietary education. Prospective authors are invited to submit abstracts of the highest quality not currently under review by another publication.

    The IJICTE journal would be pleased to receive original materials concerned with the theoretical underpinnings, successful application, and potential for advancing technology education within formal education, corporate training, higher education, professional development, and proprietary education. The IJICTE publishes contributions from all disciplines of information technology education.

    *** Submissions ***

    Articles should be between 2,000 and 6,000 words in length. Articles outside these parameters will not be considered. Submitted manuscripts must be prepared in the American Psychological Association (APA) editorial style and references should relate only to material cited within the manuscript. The review process, copyright considerations, procedures for submitting your manuscript and the review process, and additional information is provided under Guidelines for Submissions at:
    http://www.idea-group.com/journals/details.asp?id=4287

    Please email submissions to:

    “Lawrence Tomei”

    Vol 6
    2010
    Issue 21 Jan-Mar issue
    3/1/2009 - Call for Papers
    4/30/2009 - Deadline for Submissions
    5/1/2009 - Submissions to ERB
    5/31/2009 - Evaluations from ERB
    6/15/2009 - Revisions from Authors and Copyright Agreements
    6/20/2009 - TOC
    7/1/2009 - Materials due to IGI no later than the previous July 1
    ——– - Journal to printer by Oct 1
    ——– - Journal mailed to subscriber by Nov 1

    Thanks for posting this notice, if possible.

    Tom

    Tom Adamich
    Head of Metadata Services
    Muskingum College Library
    163 Stormont St.
    New Concord, OH 43762
    Office: 740-826-8015
    FAX: 740-826-8404
    email: tadamich@muskingum.edu

    Posted 17 Feb 2009 at 8:08 am
  315. Tom Adamich wrote:

    Sorry, Lauren:

    I identified you as Kristen in my message (…one of the colleagues with whom I work in OH)! Please accept my apologies! Thanks for your assistance/interest.

    Posted 17 Feb 2009 at 8:10 am
  316. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for the link, Brian… I do read Wired (on paper, even!) and immediately downloaded several of the apps. Much of the usefulness is in others using them, too, though, so not all were as useful for this experience. May in the future….

    Derik, I am totally with you. I would have expected (1) a better way to get back to older Tweets and (2) more thoughtful/reflective blog posts… however, I know I’m not doing that as much as I like, and I suspect many are in the same boat.

    Posted 22 Feb 2009 at 5:21 pm
  317. Wendy Woololk Gast wrote:

    Hi Lauren,
    you have gone so far beyond me with the internet savy stuff, it is not even funny. But, good for you, I have no clue!!!! I hope you are well and you are still happily married, as I am sure you are! I would love to keep in touch, but I really don’t know how, perhaps you do.
    Love Always,
    Wendy Woolfolk Gast

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 12:14 am
  318. Kathryn Greenhill wrote:

    I just had a personal tipping point yesterday. I was at a library conference and in each conference satchel was a different bestselling paperback donated by a publisher. I looked at mine and instantly thought “well, I like the title, but that’s a bit useless for the plane”. I realised then that Stanza on my iPhone had crept up as my preferred way of reading fiction….

    A couple of months ago I would have thought “oh great, just what I want for a long plane trip”.

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 12:22 am
  319. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hey Wendy! It’s good to hear from you! I’ve left a note for you in Facebook… we should get together sometime!

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 11:11 am
  320. lauren pressley wrote:

    Glad to hear I’m not alone in finding that it’s creeping in like this! I think it’s a good point that different formats might be better for different types of reading. I, too, am mostly reading fiction using Stanza. I wonder at what point I’ll convert to wanting to do most reading that way.

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 11:14 am
  321. DerikB wrote:

    That is one nice CV. An interesting use of Wordpress.

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 11:28 am
  322. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Derik!

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 11:39 am
  323. chaunacey dunklee wrote:

    Hi Lauren
    I follow you on Twitter and saw your blog post link. I’ve got to put my own CV together, so this is a great template to follow. Do you mind if I copy your idea?

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 2:23 pm
  324. amanda wrote:

    that’s stunning, Lauren! well done. lately I’ve been looking for ways to repurpose one of my domains into more of a lifetream and less of a blog and seeing your awesome CV site has given me all sorts of ideas. nice job :)

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 3:17 pm
  325. DerikB wrote:

    You could have a very high density of information on a page that way: feeding in Twitter, Flickr, delicious, etc, etc into small stacked columns.

    Posted 07 Mar 2009 at 3:30 pm
  326. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Chaunacey & Amanda! Of course, Chaunacey… go for it! Amanda & Derik, I love the idea of using a format like that for a lifestream. Very cool, potentially very fun to look at, and more interesting than a static page. Good stuff!

    Posted 09 Mar 2009 at 10:47 pm
  327. joan wrote:

    Wow, Lauren, this is great, and very inspiring. Thanks.

    Posted 10 Mar 2009 at 5:38 am
  328. William Turkett wrote:

    Hi Lauren,

    Interesting questions.. I’m currently thinking about all these questions as I’m coming up for tenure soon myself. While I don’t actively academically blog (and thus I need to think on your question a bit more), a first thought I had was that I expect one place where blogging could be evaluated in the tenure process is in feedback from external references. If those references feel such work is a real contribution to the general public and the community, their comments in their review could act as a quasi-peer review in a sense.

    Posted 11 Mar 2009 at 2:14 am
  329. Peter Bromberg wrote:

    Congrats again Lauren. I’m really, really pleased for you!!

    Posted 16 Mar 2009 at 5:07 pm
  330. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Peter!

    Posted 17 Mar 2009 at 9:58 pm
  331. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments! It’s a good point you make about external references. It’s interesting, because one could request letters from people they know who read the blog, could post a request for anyone with an opinion to send something to the committee, or the committee could ask someone in the field to take a look and make a recommendation (in order to get a non-reader to review it). I wonder if any institutions are taking an approach like this. Good food for thought! Thanks!

    Posted 17 Mar 2009 at 10:17 pm
  332. Africa wrote:

    author must start a second blog, it’s great!

    Posted 18 Mar 2009 at 5:47 pm
  333. Rachel wrote:

    Thanks, Lauren, and congrats!

    Posted 20 Mar 2009 at 11:47 am
  334. Jenny Levine wrote:

    Thanks, Lauren. I’m glad you like Connect so far. We’re pretty excited about it ourselves, and we’re eager to get feedback and see how folks use the site. :)

    Posted 20 Mar 2009 at 5:19 pm
  335. joan wrote:

    Lauren, I love the idea of two tracks for the Cyber Zed shed–because the most relevant technologies for our libraries may not be the cutting edge.

    While I suspect ACRL couldn’t do this, as it would compete too much with ALA, I would love to see an annual ACRL so I could bypass ALA entirely. I can’t go to two-three conferences a year, and ACRL would be my top choice every year it was available.

    Posted 23 Mar 2009 at 3:10 am
  336. joan wrote:

    I’m giving ALA Connect a try. Since I’m overseas, I’m always looking for good ways to connect with other librarians, especially those whom I know but not necessarily well enough to friend on Facebook, and those who aren’t already on Twitter.

    I’m not sure who is in the database though–is it current ALA members? I searched for a few folks, and I found two out of eight. I also stumbled over deciding how to label people–and how this will matter eventually. There are several people I think of as friends who are also former colleagues or classmates.

    I was surprised not to find any groups connected to instruction, nor to individual LS programs.

    I guess these things will evolve with time, but right now it has so few people that it’d be great to see an early adopters group, just to get things going.

    Posted 23 Mar 2009 at 7:49 am
  337. Sarah Cohen wrote:

    Great point about the tags. It was something I took for granted but you are right; it really does help bring content together. As you know, I loved the focus group too and think it has a lot of value (especially because we connected there!) As I said there, and in my own post on the this topic, I’d love to see more opportunities to discuss ideas, technologies, challenges, etc. Let’s use conferences as a way to not just share but discuss our own successes!

    Posted 23 Mar 2009 at 12:08 pm
  338. Lori Reed wrote:

    Congratulations Lauren!

    Posted 23 Mar 2009 at 8:48 pm
  339. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Rachel and Lori!!

    Posted 24 Mar 2009 at 11:50 pm
  340. lauren pressley wrote:

    Hi Joan… I’m glad you’ll give it a try… add me as a friend! :)

    I think you’re right…. it’s still in the early days. We should look into how to create groups… it would be nice to pull together the early adopters in some way!

    Posted 24 Mar 2009 at 11:50 pm
  341. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks for your comments Joan & Sarah! Joan: you hit upon something I think a lot about lately… it’s impossible to attend all the interesting looking conferences out there. I would love to attend LITA and ACRL in addition to ALAs… not to mention Computers in Libraries, Internet Librarian, and LOEX. However, since I serve on ALA committees, I mostly go to those. I would love to attend conferences where I could bring back lots of ideas, but instead I spend most of my conference time and budget in meetings.

    Sarah, I’m with you, too. I would love to see more opportunities to discuss. I (personally) mostly see that type of opportunity online at this point. How would you envision it looking at a large conference?

    Posted 24 Mar 2009 at 11:53 pm
  342. Betty Garrison wrote:

    Lauren, this is terrific. So glad you are taking a lead on this, because now I can just watch and learn. This SMS reference service might be do-able now for us. Bless you! Betty

    Posted 25 Mar 2009 at 8:29 am
  343. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Betty! I’ll be sure to let you know when I find a good solution & Google Voice is available publicly!

    Posted 30 Mar 2009 at 12:03 pm
  344. Lisa Philpotts wrote:

    Hi Lauren!

    Thanks for blogging about CIT, the sessions you attended sounded really interesting. I’m especially interested in playing around with FeedWordPress, what a neat tool!

    You’ve convinced me that I should go next year. I work at UNC HSL so I’m pretty much a stone’s throw away from Duke.

    Posted 27 Apr 2009 at 9:57 am
  345. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for reading, Lisa! I’m glad it was interesting… maybe we’ll cross paths next year. :)

    Posted 27 Apr 2009 at 10:29 am
  346. Rachel Franke wrote:

    Thanks for bringing up FERPA – I was unclear how student’s educational records are protected on public sites/tools, too. I’ll see what I can find out and would like to hear more on your concerns.

    Posted 28 Apr 2009 at 12:10 pm
  347. Blogger for Middle East Teaching Careers wrote:

    Establishing a blog is way easier than maintaining one. Be sure you have the passion of keeping up with updates and have the focus of maintaining your own topic.

    But teaching through blogging is a very good channel if properly structured.

    Posted 03 May 2009 at 3:06 am
  348. oneness wrote:

    It is nice to note that your interest revolves around teaching computers to the beginners. Teaching is always great fun and very satisfying thing to do. And of all the subjects, you have chosen computers which is very apt at this point of time.

    Posted 05 May 2009 at 6:12 am
  349. chad wrote:

    What is Thinking Rock? I feel like I’ve heard of that. It’s for GTD? and Bacarli, I use Outlook Track-It for my ebay business. It’s a great little toolbar for Outlook. The followup reminders are great.

    Posted 05 May 2009 at 12:21 pm
  350. Julie wrote:

    Even though I’m not a parent, while reading Outliers I couldn’t help thinking how it validates the odd child, the one who is curious and thoughtful, maybe doesn’t quite fit in – those are the ones that grow up to be Bill Gates! I have a niece that fits that description. She may end up curing cancer :)

    Posted 13 May 2009 at 9:06 am
  351. suzanne wrote:

    Outliers blew my mind as well. I find myself STILL thinking about it. And he makes a great case; working hard, plus talent, plus OPPORTUNITY makes for a meteoric career rise.

    Posted 13 May 2009 at 1:00 pm
  352. Student Jobs wrote:

    It’s somewhat rare for students to enjoy their jobs in college. I know my first internship in college showed me that I didn’t want to work in that industry.

    Sometimes just working at the school cafeteria can be the perfect fit for a student. It beats filing papers all day in a cubicle, and you usually get some free food!

    Posted 14 May 2009 at 8:13 pm
  353. Peter Bromberg wrote:

    Congrats Lauren! Just placed my order- looking forward to the read :-)

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 7:37 am
  354. DerikB wrote:

    Congratulations, Lauren!

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 9:14 am
  355. Jennifer wrote:

    Congratulations!! I’m definitely going to get a copy!

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 11:50 am
  356. ellie wrote:

    Congratulations!

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 1:22 pm
  357. Mary wrote:

    Congrats!

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 1:50 pm
  358. brian wrote:

    Congrats! Now that this is done we can start working on our project

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 2:57 pm
  359. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks everyone! You guys are great!

    Posted 01 Jul 2009 at 11:03 pm
  360. Lori Reed wrote:

    Congrats Lauren. What a great accomplishment! Can’t wait to read it.

    Posted 02 Jul 2009 at 6:56 pm
  361. Little J wrote:

    I hope this doesn’t sound too stalkerish or weird, since I found this blog entry from a google search on brightkite and how it could know my location from my phone, but …

    I’m a Raleigh-ite too! It made me smile to see someone else from my neck of the woods who wrote such a good and convincing blog entry.

    I hope you don’t mind if I read your link on what twitter can do.

    Posted 02 Jul 2009 at 11:41 pm
  362. Jorge wrote:

    Thanks! I tend not to post on blogs but I had to give you the thumbs up, keep up the good work!

    Posted 05 Jul 2009 at 2:41 pm
  363. Rachel wrote:

    Congrats!

    Posted 07 Jul 2009 at 5:59 pm
  364. bne wrote:

    Twitter is more fun than ever since most I follow are at ALA. Thanks for sharing tweets and pics. Will be at the exhibits on Monday.

    Posted 12 Jul 2009 at 9:21 am
  365. syd wrote:

    ALA, ACRL, AASL are great resources for Libraians!!!

    Posted 16 Jul 2009 at 8:57 am
  366. Michele wrote:

    Does everyone at your library report back after conferences via blog post? What a great idea.

    Posted 16 Jul 2009 at 7:57 pm
  367. Bobbi wrote:

    It was great to finally meet you F2F!

    Posted 17 Jul 2009 at 10:18 am
  368. William Patrick Wend wrote:

    I am ordering your book tonight! Recently, I have become very interested in moving away from English (I finished my MA in May) and moving in the direction of Library Science. Considering going for an MLS right now and I hope your book will be helpful. Thanks.

    Posted 28 Jul 2009 at 1:22 pm
  369. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thank you for all your kind words, everybody! William, let me know if you want to chat libraries sometime!

    Posted 03 Aug 2009 at 10:26 pm
  370. lauren pressley wrote:

    Bobbie, It was great to meet you IRL, too!

    Michele, yes we do! When we get any funding for professional development we report back via a staff presentation, blog post, etc. The blog posts are the most popular option though, and over the years they’ve gotten much more detailed and even more useful. I highly recommend it!

    Posted 03 Aug 2009 at 11:06 pm
  371. Michelle wrote:

    That was so cool. Thanks for making us aware of it.

    Posted 04 Aug 2009 at 8:10 pm
  372. William Patrick Wend wrote:

    Lauren after I finish your book I am sure I will have plenty of questions for you. I will let you know then.

    Posted 05 Aug 2009 at 4:55 pm
  373. Brett Bonfield wrote:

    My turn to catch up after being away, so I just came across this post.

    Lauren, your compliment made my day — thanks for watching the video and for sharing it.

    Posted 07 Aug 2009 at 12:32 pm
  374. William Patrick Wend wrote:

    I really like these, I think I can find a use for something similar in my ENG courses when we get to discussing research.

    Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 9:17 pm
  375. ellie wrote:

    These are fantastic, and so are all the assignments on the blog. You are an inspiration!

    Posted 23 Sep 2009 at 5:57 pm
  376. Amy wrote:

    Thank you for doing this, Lauren! This is the closest thing to getting a transcript of the talk. Mucho gracias.

    Posted 03 Oct 2009 at 12:49 pm
  377. ranti wrote:

    Thanks for the notes, Lauren.

    Posted 03 Oct 2009 at 1:34 pm
  378. Max Macias wrote:

    Thank you for breaking this down and for pointing us to the report Lauren. This is important!

    Posted 03 Oct 2009 at 8:58 pm
  379. Rory Litwin wrote:

    Here is my response:

    http://libraryjuicepress.com/blog/?p=1722

    Posted 04 Oct 2009 at 8:51 am
  380. John Liu wrote:

    Hi, saw the mention of the Merck Manuals in your post. Just wanted to let you know that today we launched new Merck Manual Home Edition and Professional Edition iPhone apps:
    http://agilepartners.com/apps/merckmanuals

    Here’s Merck’s press release:
    http://www.merck.com/newsroom/press_releases/corporate/2009_1008.html

    Posted 08 Oct 2009 at 1:48 pm
  381. DerikB wrote:

    That video is just way too long…

    Posted 30 Oct 2009 at 12:39 pm
  382. Beki wrote:

    Thanks so much for coming Lauren! It was a great presentation, lot’s of food for thought!

    Posted 03 Nov 2009 at 1:02 pm
  383. TFallrickece wrote:

    salt pills take together tramadol with gaba Dental abnormalities seen in cleidocranial dysplasia may include delayed loss of the primary (baby) teeth; delayed appearance of the secondary (adult) teeth; unusually shaped, peg-like teeth; misalignment of the teeth and jaws (malocclusion); and extra teeth, sometimes accompanied by cysts in the gums.
    techcrunch tablet cialis pricing strategy Microorganisms — bacteria, fungi, protozoa — can grow in recreational water sources such as pools, spas, and hot tubs. The proper chemistry (pH, sanitizer concentration) must be maintained to prevent microbial contamination and growth.
    ca physicians cialis usual dosage Enhanced fecal excretion of parenterally administered vincristine has been demonstrated in dogs pretreated with cholestyramine. There are no published clinical data on the use of cholestyramine as an antidote in humans.
    western pharmacy online phentermine sales us licensed pharmacies Telithromycin has the potential to prolong the QTc interval of the electrocardiogram in some patients. QTc prolongation may lead to an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias, including torsades de pointes. Thus, telithromycin should be avoided in patients with congenital prolongation of the QTc interval, and in patients with ongoing proarrhythmic conditions such as uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, clinically significant bradycardia, and in patients receiving Class IA (e.g., quinidine and procainamide) or Class III (e.g., dofetilide) antiarrhythmic agents.
    symptoms for bronchitis dolcet tramadol Intensive maintenance with IDAMYCIN (idarubicin hydrochloride for injection, USP) is not recommended in view of the considerable toxicity (including deaths in remission) experienced by patients during the maintenance phase of Study 2.
    symptoms for leprosy phentermine erection supplements brain The hazards (see section-7 WARNINGS] and section-9 ADVERSE REACTIONS]) of enalapril are generally independent of dose; those of felodipine are a mixture of dose-dependent phenomena (primarily peripheral edema) and dose-independent phenomena, the former much more common than the latter. Therapy with any combination of enalapril and felodipine will thus be associated with both sets of dose-independent hazards.
    doctors healthcare cialis costa rica Although it is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk, animal studies have demonstrated that varenicline can be transferred to nursing pups. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from CHANTIX, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.
    prednisone medicine cheap tramadol it Promethazine is a phenothiazine derivative which differs structurally from the antipsychotic phenothiazines by the presence of a branched side chain and no ring substitution. It is thought that this configuration is responsible for its relative lack (1/10 that of chlorpromazine) of dopamine antagonist properties.
    canadian drug ship cialis to po box Ranexa has been evaluated in patients with chronic angina who remained symptomatic despite treatment with the maximum dose of an antianginal agent. In the ERICA (Efficacy of Ranolazine In Chronic Angina) trial, 565 patients were randomized to receive an initial dose of Ranexa 500 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 1 week, followed by 6 weeks of treatment with Ranexa 1000 mg b.i.d. or placebo, in addition to concomitant treatment with amlodipine 10 mg q.d. In addition, 45% of the study population also received long-acting nitrates. Sublingual nitrates were used as needed to treat angina episodes. Results are shown in Table 1. Statistically significant decreases in angina attack frequency (p = 0.028) and nitroglycerin use (p = 0.014) were observed with Ranexa compared to placebo. These treatment effects appeared consistent across age and use of long-acting nitrates. The mean magnitude of effect was smaller in women.
    prescribing prism tramadol recreational drug use Anthrax is diagnosed by isolating the bacteria B. anthracis from tissues or blood of suspected cases, or by finding specific antibodies against B. anthracis in the blood of persons with suspected cases.
    adolescent medicine cheapest phentermine online best online pharmacy All patients should be observed for clinical signs of electrolyte imbalances such as dryness of mouth, thirst, weakness, lethargy, drowsiness, restlessness, muscle pains or cramps, muscular fatigue, hypotension, oliguria, tachycardia, and gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea and vomiting.
    open pharmacy still hungry on phentermine The main goals of the Human Genome Project were to provide a complete and accurate sequence of the 3 billion DNA base pairs that make up the human genome and to find all of the estimated 20,000 to 25,000 human genes. The Project also aimed to sequence the genomes of several other organisms that are important to medical research, such as the mouse and the fruit fly.
    pain for paris cheep tramadol Drugs that are CYP3A4 inhibitors, of which ketoconazole is the most common example, can interfere with the metabolism of fluticasone and can result in high levels of the drug and lead to suppression of the adrenal gland. Adrenal suppression can lead to diarrhea, loss of blood pressure (hypotension), and (in rare cases) death, if blood pressure is very low, and stays very low, for a prolonged period of time, or if a viral infection or other stress has occurred in the body during this time.
    lsu school of medicine atacand cialis Additional adverse events reported in other clinical studies and in foreign postmarketing surveillance and foreign clinical trials with the use of VISIPAQUE Injection are: anaphylactic reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, hypoglycemia, amnesia, cardiac arrest, hypertension, dyskinesia, hemorrhage not otherwise specified, polymyalgia rheumatica, pulmonary embolism, respiratory depression, and cortical blindness.
    tablet counter phentermine neurotoxicity In the disease atherosclerosis, which is extremely common in developed nations, fatty material called plaque deposits on the inside walls of coronary arteries. The accumulation of plaque narrows the arteries and hinders blood flow. Smoking and some medical conditions such as diabetes and high cholesterol also promote plaque formation and narrowing of the arteries. The narrow arteries and consequent sluggish blood flow can cause chest pain (angina) and increase the risk of a heart attack.
    physical therapy for acl tramadol hydrochloride sustained In a non-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical study (Study D, n=347), pediatric patients (age range 6 to 17) with type 1 diabetes were treated for 26 weeks with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. LEVEMIR and NPH human insulin were administered once- or twice-daily (bedtime only or morning and bedtime) according to each patient’s pre-trial dose regimen. Bolus insulin aspart was administered before each meal. LEVEMIR-treated patients had a decrease in HbA1c similar to those treated with NPH human insulin.
    supplements for hair loss cialis for circulation Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents including Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: In some patients with compromised renal function who are being treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including those that selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2 inhibitors), the co-administration of angiotensin II receptor antagonists including losartan, may result in a further deterioration of renal function. These effects are usually reversible.
    vitamin supplements homemade cialis For more information on the symptoms of primary immunodeficiency, check out the 10 Warning Signs of Primary Immunodeficiency. The NICHD is one of the many partners of the Jeffery Modell Foundation, a primary resource for information about primary immunodeficiency, in getting the word out about primary immunodeficiency and its warning signs.
    ca physicians tramadol 5mg Propoxyphene products in excessive doses, either alone or in combination with other CNS depressants, including alcohol, are a major cause of drug-related deaths. Fatalities within the first hour of overdosage are not uncommon. In a survey of deaths due to overdosage conducted in 1975, in approximately 20% of the fatal cases, death occurred within the first hour (5% occurred within 15 minutes). Propoxyphene should not be taken in doses higher than those recommended by the physician. The judicious prescribing of propoxyphene is essential to the safe use of this drug. With patients who are depressed or suicidal, consideration should be given to the use of non-narcotic analgesics. Patients should be cautioned about the concomitant use of propoxyphene products and alcohol because of potentially serious CNS-additive effects of these agents. Because of its added depressant effects, propoxyphene should be prescribed with caution for those patients whose medical condition requires the concomitant administration of sedatives, tranquilizers, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, or other CNS-depressant drugs. Patients should be advised of the additive depressant effects of these combinations.
    mail prescriptions tramadol transporter Psoriasis patients receiving other immunosuppressive agents or radiation therapy (including PUVA and UVB) should not receive concurrent cyclosporine because of the possibility of excessive immunosuppression.
    drug and alcohol rehab prospect cialis The primary activity of NovoLog?® Mix 70/30 is the regulation of glucose metabolism. Insulins, including NovoLog?® Mix 70/30, exert their specific action through binding to insulin receptors. Insulin binding activates mechanisms to lower blood glucose by facilitating cellular uptake of glucose into skeletal muscle and fat, simultaneously inhibiting the output of glucose from the liver.
    pravachol prescribing information xanax on drug tests Sumatriptan should not be given to patients with documented ischemic or vasospastic CAD (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). It is strongly recommended that sumatriptan not be given to patients in whom unrecognized CAD is predicted by the presence of risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoker, obesity, diabetes, strong family history of CAD, female with surgical or physiological menopause, or male over 40 years of age) unless a cardiovascular evaluation provides satisfactory clinical evidence that the patient is reasonably free of coronary artery and ischemic myocardial disease or other significant underlying cardiovascular disease. The sensitivity of cardiac diagnostic procedures to detect cardiovascular disease or predisposition to coronary artery vasospasm is modest, at best. If, during the cardiovascular evaluation, the patient??™s medical history or electrocardiographic investigations reveal findings indicative of or consistent with coronary artery vasospasm or myocardial ischemia, sumatriptan should not be administered (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
    prescribing medicines tramadol 100mg medicine The NINDS supports and conducts research on neurogenetic disorders such as Aicardi Syndrome. The goals of this research are to locate and understand the genes involved and to develop techniques to diagnose, treat, prevent, and ultimately cure the disorder.
    addict tramadol benzodiazepine The rate at which primary care trusts (PCTs) across England are implementing the NICE guideline has varied. There continues to be wide variation in the number of IVF cycles funded, and the waiting time for treatment but PCTs across England are working to provide the same levels of service.
    pharmacists prescribing cialis to buy new zealand There is an ongoing clinical trial looking at the effect of valerian on the sleep of healthy older adults. The trial is active but not recruiting participants. Further information is available at ClinicalTrials.gov: valerian trials.
    24 hour pharmacies phentermine increased heart rate Tell your health care provider or diabetes educator about all medicines and supplements that you are using. Some medicines, including non-prescription medicines and dietary supplements, may affect your diabetes.
    golden tablets does tramadol have acetaminophen For adults and children 5 years of age or older, the usual dosage is the inhalation of the contents of one 12-mcg FORADIL capsule at least 15 minutes before exercise administered on an occasional as needed basis. When used intermittently as needed for prevention, protection may last up to 12 hours.
    pharmacy technicians interactions tramadol and imigran The Continuity of Care Record standard, often referred to simply as the CCR standard or CCR, is a patient health summary standard, widely used for secure, computable, electronic capture and transfers of personal health data from one health IT system to another, e.g. EHRs or EMRs, and to and from these to personal health record (PHR) applications, such as Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault. The CCR standard utilizes W3C compliant eXtensible Markup Language, XML, to create flexible documents that are intended to contain relevant summary health information about a person for the purposes of coordination of care, continuity of care, and access on networked systems.
    bay area physicians tramadol medication no prescription Induction doses of ALFENTA should be administered slowly (over three minutes). Administration may produce loss of vascular tone and hypotension. Consideration should be given to fluid replacement prior to induction.
    can pharmacist prescribe is tramadol stronger than darvocet A pathologist will look at the kidney tissue samples to check for unusual deposits, scarring, or infecting organisms that would explain your condition. The doctor may discover that you have a condition that can be treated and cured. If you have progressive kidney failure, the biopsy may indicate how quickly the disease is advancing. A biopsy can also help explain why a transplanted kidney is not working properly.
    supplement cialis generico mexico The FDA approved entry inhibitors for use with other anti-HIV agents in the treatment of HIV infection in 2007. Maraviroc (Selzentry) is currently the only approved drug in this class. It works by preventing HIV from attaching to a receptor on the surface of T-helper cells called CCR5. For most isolates of HIV, binding to the CCR5 receptor is a necessary step in the process of entering (infecting) the T-helper cell (these are called CCR5-tropic isolates of HIV). Some isolates, however, can use other receptors on the T-helper cell surface to enter the cell. Thus, maraviroc and other similar drugs would have little effect on these types of HIV. A blood test is available which can be used to detect CCR5-tropic forms of HIV.
    get a prescription online order overnight tramadol Peak circulating levels of cinacalcet are achieved between two and six hours after dose administration. Cinacalcet is metabolized by enzymes in the liver called CYP3A4, CYP2D6 and CYP1A2. Approximately 80% of the dose is excreted in the urine and 15% is excreted in the feces.
    doctor’s buy phentermine overnight saturday delivery purephentermine The usual oral dosage is 0.1 to 0.2? mg/kg body weight daily for 3 to 6? weeks as required. This usually amounts to 4 to 10? mg per day for the average patient. The entire daily dose may be given at one time. These dosages are for initiation of therapy or for short courses of treatment. The dosage must be carefully adjusted according to the response of the patient and must be reduced as soon as there is an abrupt fall in the white blood cell count. Patients with Hodgkin??™s disease usually require 0.2? mg/kg daily, whereas patients with other lymphomas or chronic lymphocytic leukemia usually require only 0.1? mg/kg daily. When lymphocytic infiltration of the bone marrow is present, or when the bone marrow is hypoplastic, the daily dose should not exceed 0.1? mg/kg (about 6? mg for the average patient).
    starcaps diet pills adipex experience Compartment syndrome may be caused by a one-time traumatic injury (acute compartment syndrome), such as a fractured bone or a hard blow to the thigh, by repeated hard blows (depending upon the sport), or by ongoing overuse (chronic exertional compartment syndrome), which may occur, for example, in long-distance running.
    find doctors in phentermine for shift workers NUROMAX diluted up to 1:10 in 5% Dextrose Injection, USP or 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP has been shown to be physically and chemically stable when stored in polypropylene syringes at 5?° to 25?°C (41?° to 77?°F), for up to 24? hours. Since dilution diminishes the preservative effectiveness of benzyl alcohol, aseptic techniques should be used to prepare the diluted product. Immediate use of the diluted product is preferred, and any unused portion of diluted NUROMAX should be discarded after 8 hours.
    medical doctors firstfind cheap phentermine Erythromycin is a substrate and inhibitor of the 3A isoform subfamily of the cytochrome p450 enzyme system (CYP3A). Coadministration of erythromycin and a drug primarily metabolized by CYP3A may be associated with elevations in drug concentrations that could increase or prolong both the therapeutic and adverse effects of the concomitant drug. Dosage adjustments may be considered, and when possible, serum concentrations of drugs primarily metabolized by CYP3A should be monitored closely in patients concurrently receiving erythromycin.
    pharmacy news adipex no memberships Each mL contains ergoloid mesylates, USP as follows: dihydroergocornine mesylate 0.333? mg, dihydroergocristine mesylate 0.333? mg, and dihydroergocryptine (dihydro-alpha-ergocryptine and dihydro-beta-ergocryptine in the proportion of 2:1) mesylate 0.333? mg, representing a total of 1mg; alcohol, 28.5% by volume.
    preventive medicine residency cheap drug retin tramadol Pharmacokinetic studies have been performed in adult leukemia patients with normal renal and hepatic function following intravenous administration of 10 to 12 mg/m2 of idarubicin daily for 3 to 4 days as a single agent or combined with cytarabine. The plasma concentrations of idarubicin are best described by a two or three compartment open model. The elimination rate of idarubicin from plasma is slow with an estimated mean terminal half-life of 22 hours (range, 4 to 48 hours) when used as a single agent and 20 hours (range, 7 to 38 hours) when used in combination with cytarabine. The elimination of the primary active metabolite, idarubicinol, is considerably slower than that of the parent drug with an estimated mean terminal half-life that exceeds 45 hours; hence, its plasma levels are sustained for a period greater than 8 days.
    prescribing placebos adipex no prior prescription needed There are several muscles involved in moving the knee. The four quadriceps muscles on the front of the thigh work to straighten the knee from a bent position. The hamstring muscles, which run along the back of the thigh from the hip to just below the knee, help to bend the knee. Several muscles of the hip help to bring the leg towards the body or away and provide added support. The large muscle of the calf (the gastrocnemius) attaches above the knee and helps to control the knee especially while walking or running.
    physicians associates cialis ranitidine NSAIDs inhibit platelet aggregation and have been shown to prolong bleeding time in some patients. Unlike aspirin, their effect on platelet function is quantitatively less, of shorter duration, and reversible. Patients receiving ketoprofen extended-release capsules who may be adversely affected by alterations in platelet function, such as those with coagulation disorders or patients receiving anticoagulants, should be carefully monitored.
    symptom tramadol hydrochloride 2c acetaminophen Cells depleted of GMP are unable to synthesize guanine triphosphate (GTP) and deoxy guanine triphosphate (dGTP) and therefore cannot replicate unless they are able to maintain GMP levels through the purine salvage pathway. B and T lymphocytes lack a key enzyme of this salvage pathway, hypoxathine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase, and are therefore unable to replicate in the presence of MMF as they cannot bypass this MPA-induced block with cells staying in the S phase of the cell cycle (67). MMF therefore has a powerful cytostatic effect on lymphocytes by inhibiting both mitogen- and alloantigen-induced stimulation. The effects of MMF can be reversed by guanosine and deoxyguanosine. MMF also reduces recruitment of leucocytes to inflammatory sites.
    dui tramadol abuse snort Careful attention should be given to the selection of candidates for clomiphene citrate therapy. Pelvic examination is necessary prior to clomiphene citrate treatment and before each subsequent course (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS).
    patient accounts tramadol 50 mg no prescription Drugs that lower the seizure threshold, including MAO inhibitors, should not be used with Amipaque?® (metrizamide, Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals). As with other MAO inhibitors, Marplan should be discontinued at least 48? hours before myelography and should not be resumed for at least 24? hours postprocedure.
    usb tablet tramadol for dogs drowsy The pancreas is an organ located behind the lower part of the stomach. Throughout the pancreas are clusters of cells called the islets of Langerhans. Islets are made up of several types of cells, including beta cells that make insulin.
    generic ip missed xanax If hypotension (systolic blood pressure ?‰¤90 mmHg) occurs, metoprolol tartrate should be discontinued, and the hemodynamic status of the patient and the extent of myocardial damage carefully assessed. Invasive monitoring of central venous, pulmonary capillary wedge, and arterial pressures may be required. Appropriate therapy with fluids, positive inotropic agents, balloon counterpulsation, or other treatment modalities should be instituted. If hypotension is associated with sinus bradycardia or AV block, treatment should be directed at reversing these (see above).
    adjuvant therapy for breast cancer buy injectable valium The needs of both the patient and the clinician for connection and meaning in their lives are possibly met through a transpersonal dimension of medical care that may be recognized in occasional moments during medical encounters. These moments are often marked by a physiologic reaction, such as gooseflesh or a chill; by an immediacy of awareness of the patient’s situation (as if experiencing it from inside the patient’s world); by a sense of being part of a larger whole; and by a lingering feeling of joy, peacefulness, or awe. Such moments seem to be therapeutic for the patient and the clinician alike. (Matthews 1993).
    symptoms for mono buy tramadol 50mg $75 Medicines are sometimes prescribed for conditions that are not mentioned in patient information leaflets. Do not take Femtrace for conditions for which it was not prescribed. Do not give Femtrace to other people, even if they have the same symptoms you have. It may harm them.
    prescriptions order cialis heart rate One species of schistosome often implicated in cases of cercarial dermatitis is Austrobilharzia variglandis, whose normal hosts are ducks. The snail, Nassarius obsoletus, is the intermediate host for this species and can be found at marine beaches in temperate climates.
    baby formula service order adipex no prescripyion “Social distancing” Keep ill family members away from others in the home and at home unless they need medical care. If ill and you have to go out, wear a mask to catch coughs and sneezes and reduce the transmission of infective droplets to others.In general, do not share drinks or eating utensils. Do not share towels. Color coding towels for different family members can help reduce spread, too.
    nova pharmacy buy tramadol cheap only After dispensing to patient: Store at 20?°C to 25?°C (68?°F to 77?°F) USP Controlled Room Temperature]. Protect from heat and moisture. CAPSULES SHOULD ALWAYS BE STORED IN THE BLISTER AND ONLY REMOVED FROM THE BLISTER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE USE.

    Posted 09 Nov 2009 at 9:22 pm
  384. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Beki! I really had fun!!

    Posted 10 Nov 2009 at 3:05 pm
  385. Megan Hodge wrote:

    Congratulations, Lauren! That’s wonderful news. All the best to you and your growing family.

    Posted 13 Nov 2009 at 12:56 pm
  386. Meredith wrote:

    Congratulations! I had the same thing in the first trimester — the only things I could stomach eating were crackers and potatoes. I didn’t even like sweets, which is bizarre for me. Later on, I became ravenous. Good luck on staying vegan — I’ve never been a big meat eater, but I wanted it all the time when I was pregnant. I ate a hamburger for the first time in about 15 years and couldn’t get enough of them. But you never know what your cravings will be for — could be hummus or bean burritos or something! Your body will tell you what it needs to keep that baby happy and healthy.

    Good luck to you and your husband. It’s been without a doubt the most stressful experience of my life and it turns everything in your world upside down, but it’s so worth it. Babies are amazing and it’s so much fun to watch them grow and develop a personality and new skills every day. :)

    Posted 13 Nov 2009 at 1:13 pm
  387. Sarah Cohen wrote:

    Love it. Congratulations!

    Posted 13 Nov 2009 at 3:03 pm
  388. Paul wrote:

    Hey, congratulations!

    Posted 13 Nov 2009 at 3:21 pm
  389. Samantha wrote:

    Congratulations!!! It’s a wonderful and life-changing event.

    Posted 13 Nov 2009 at 9:17 pm
  390. Brandi Tutle wrote:

    Congrats!!! I’m so very happy for you! Sorry your first 3 months were rough but glad you see light at the end of the first trimester tunnel. I fell off the vegan wagon after a bit when I became really adverse to soy and then diabetic in the last few months…

    Let me know when/if you are in the Triangle area. I’d love to get together!
    Take care and happy pregnancy!

    Posted 14 Nov 2009 at 1:26 am
  391. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks Megan, Meredith, Sarah, Paul, Samantha, and Brandi!

    Meredith, I’m sorry your first wasn’t too fun either, but it’s nice to know I was in good company. And eating is even more fun than before now. :) I’m watching for cravings. So far nothing animalish, but I’m certainly not going to be fanatical about it if I do start feeling that way. If I have to, I hope to crave eggs or something, though. :)

    Brandi, oh my, it sounds like some crazy food issues for the last few months! I keep wondering if I’m going to develop something just because I’m eating more food than normal lately, which also means more soy. We’ll see…. I actually am going to be going to the Triangle a bunch over the next few months. I’ll Facebook you to see if any of the times would make sense. It’d be fun to get together! :)

    Posted 14 Nov 2009 at 9:35 am
  392. Mary Carmen wrote:

    Congratulations, Lauren!! Fantastic news! How exciting for both of you!!! Wishing you all the best for a smooth pregnancy!

    Posted 14 Nov 2009 at 11:25 am
  393. Lori Reed wrote:

    Congrats! Welcome to the library mom club. I seriously want to start a library moms blog. I hope the ms gets better. Feel free to contact me for tips, support, etc. I still have it 2 years later. :(

    I’m so happy for you! P.S. I have tons of baby stuff if you ever make it to Charlotte.

    Posted 18 Nov 2009 at 8:59 am
  394. Lauren Pressley wrote:

    Thanks so much, Mary and Lori!

    & Lori, I’ll let you know if I make it to Charlotte sometime soon. :) I’m sorry to hear about the ms lasting so long…. I’m not exactly myself yet, but I expected that at this phase… it never occurred to me that it might go on for so long. You might be onto something with the library moms blog idea… :)

    Posted 23 Nov 2009 at 9:15 am
  395. William Patrick Wend wrote:

    Congrats x 2 for the upcoming baby and for staying vegan!

    Posted 28 Nov 2009 at 12:53 pm
  396. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks, William!

    Posted 29 Nov 2009 at 8:04 pm
  397. suzanne wrote:

    Wonderful news! I am so glad you survived the first semester. I thought that three months were the worst, the barfing and the tiredness and the secrecy. By then end, when you were feeling better, people were nice to you and helped you with things like doors, but you really needed the help more at the beginning.

    Good luck! All of your readers are cheering for all three of you…!

    Posted 30 Nov 2009 at 4:39 pm
  398. Lauren Pressley wrote:

    Thanks, Suzanne! That’s exactly the weird thing about the first trimester! You put it much more succinctly. :)

    Posted 30 Nov 2009 at 6:40 pm
  399. Bobbi Newman wrote:

    Congratulations Lauren! I’m so happy for you. I’m glad you survived your first trimester, I hope its smooth sailing from here on out.

    Posted 04 Dec 2009 at 7:14 am
  400. James Neal wrote:

    Lauren,

    See this few links from my Diigo library re: Digital Humanities. It’s an area I’m pretty passionate about and plan on exploring when I enter library school next year. Peace.
    James

    http://www.diigo.com/search?adSScope=my&what=digitalhumanities

    Posted 13 Dec 2009 at 8:54 pm
  401. Lauren Pressley wrote:

    I can’t wait to see what you work on as you enter library school!

    Posted 23 Dec 2009 at 1:52 pm
  402. brian mathews wrote:

    Too much East Coast / South East bias on that panel :) Re: tech trends, don’t sleep on voice-searching!!!!

    Posted 06 Jan 2010 at 5:02 pm
  403. Brett Bonfield wrote:

    Congrats! Looks like an interesting panel. Is it 100% first-timers?

    Posted 06 Jan 2010 at 5:20 pm
  404. Karen G. Schneider wrote:

    Bravo, you! I hope to be there to cheer you on!

    – Karen, TTT Emerita

    Posted 06 Jan 2010 at 5:38 pm
  405. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks all!

    But Brian, there are just two from the South East, and one from the North East… I actually thought it was pretty good distribution. :) And you watch, I have a blog post brewing on voice-searching!!

    Brett, indeed it is. I think they were interested in seeing what perspectives a new group would bring. Should be interesting!

    Karen, it would be good to see you! I always enjoyed your perspectives at the TTTs I’ve attended!

    Posted 06 Jan 2010 at 6:23 pm
  406. KG wrote:

    Lauren,
    If you haven’t already, you might want to check out the MLA’s wiki on evaluating digital scholarship: http://wiki.mla.org/index.php/Evaluation_Wiki

    I found the page on Documenting a New Media Case especially helpful as I consider my own new media endeavors in light of self-evaluation and promotion.

    Posted 07 Jan 2010 at 1:06 pm
  407. lauren pressley wrote:

    Thanks KG! That is awesome!

    Posted 07 Jan 2010 at 9:55 pm
  408. lauren wrote:

    Your class sounds great! I agree, it'd be extremely useful for all SLIS students to have a background in these elements. Not only do they have an impact on our users' information context, but they're excellent ways for us to learn more about our own profession!

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:36 pm
  409. lauren wrote:

    Thanks for the comment, Travis! I'm going to look into the Hardt/Talking with Talis podcast (as well as all things Identity 2.0). I look forward to checking out your blog for thoughts on Identity 2.0, too.

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:36 pm
  410. Joshua Porter wrote:

    Thanks, Lauren! Let me know how I can do better…

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:36 pm
  411. Craig wrote:

    Lauren-

    I also heard and enjoyed the Basbanes talk. I remember when his earlier book- A Gentle Madness-was published, my supervisor at the time felt the book was dangerous!

    Imagine that! Gentle Madness mentioned several norious library thieves-and that nfo out there might be bad for library security or something..not sure.

    anyway- great site!

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:36 pm
  412. brian wrote:

    Thanks for doing this. We were told it was going to be a txt chat and sort of were not ready to blab on about this topic. Looks like you captured it all very well– and fast!

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:37 pm
  413. Amanda wrote:

    Did you find anyone that blogged “Leadership for Learning”?

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:37 pm
  414. evonne wrote:

    I've collected more Camp Darfur photos from our real world camps and the Second Life camp here; we also published 3000 of the real Camp Darfur Comix as a way to educate kids on what's happening in Darfur today. Thanks for blogging and sharing this project with others.

    Posted 10 Jan 2010 at 7:37 pm
  415. Jason Griffey wrote:

    You forgot the Nexus One, which has added the feature that’s soon to come to all Android devices: Universal Text recognition. Any text field at all can be voiced, anywhere on the phone, built into the OS. And thanks to a two-mic noise cancellation system, it works even in noisy environments. Take a look at the Nexus One video I shot at CES for an example: http://bit.ly/perpetualbeta

    Posted 11 Jan 2010 at 10:55 pm
  416. lauren pressley wrote:

    Bah, and how could I have forgotten!! That is totally awesome, and clearly where it’s going. I actually remember being a little disappointed with the iPhone because that’s what I *expected* the voice control to do. :) Thx for the video… going to check it out now!

    Posted 11 Jan 2010 at 11:00 pm