Blueprints for Learning

Blueprint for Learning
Laurie Richlin (based on her book)

  • This presentation was about Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  • This is about getting credit for what you do
  • Want to capture what works and what doesn’t work
  • “Can’t save by analysis what you bunged by design”
  • First step: know your users
  • both inside the classroom and out
  • know how they’re going to use the class materials
  • we need to be really thoughtful about each thing we do and how we include it
  • The four essential elements are: instructor, students, environment, and content
  • all four work together
  • The instructor is the maximum and the limit of what you can do within the classroom (in terms of what they’re comfortable doing
  • How you begin the experiential learning process is a personal style: some just get going & learn theory later, others want to observe, others learn, etc
  • Kolb learning personality style
  • Your students are probably much more hands on and less interested in theory
  • From the audience: “you can’t teach process by just giving answers.”
  • Think about what you can stand doing (even if it’s not your favorite method of teaching) that might reach a different type of student
  • Described Perry’s research (which is very interesting work!)
  • this research describes a process of change over time in the way students perceive professor and information (for local folks: I have a book on this in my office if anyone wants to read it)
  • Also covered the research of Belenky, Clinchy, et al’s research (Perry’s left out women, Clinchy et al covered that)
  • A scientist would never start an experiment without doing research to see if it’s been done before and if it has happened and what happened. Why do we teach this way?
  • Teach in a scholarly way and you can share what you’ve learned in order to share information with others so they can teach more effectively
  • No matter why you teach what you teach, it all comes down to it will lead to a better life
  • marketing: does this sound interesting? would the course add to the value for the student?
  • Time limits: we don’t have time to teach beyond the goals and objectives of the course
  • Learning Objectives are what students do, something that can be evaluated
  • Look at Rubistar: helps teachers create rubrics, federal money pays for it

Related posts:

  1. UNC TLT Conference
  2. Tools for Blended Learning
  3. Blended Learning in Contexts
  4. Teaching Librarians About Teaching
  5. computers in the classroom

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Additional comments powered by BackType