I like the introduction of “read-write” into the Library 2.0 discussion. Luke the Librarian at Gordian-Knot has an excellent post on the issue. I hadn’t quite articulated it that way, but I identify this with “remix culture” where people contribute to the collective base of information.
I also think this two way, conversational view of Library 2.0 fits in with my growing interest in library as third place. If the library is a real or virtual place where people contribute to discussions, idea, and the general information pool, they will feel a tie to the community and the place.
So, my current idea of Library 2.0 involves technology in a major way, but merely because it is what the community wants (I am at a school where every student has a wireless laptop) and it is a way to facilitate relationships in a way that is comfortable with our users. Library 2.0 is actually about the people, the relationships, and the general information sharing that can occur in these environments.
If you would like, here is a little more information on Third Places.
Related posts:
Post a Comment